Is selling photos on stock sites a realistic way to make money from a hobby?
Asked 8/22/2010
6 views
2 answers
0
I’m thinking about uploading some of my photos to stock photography websites to earn a little money back from a hobby. Is stock photography generally a sensible side income, or is the market so competitive and saturated that most hobbyists won’t earn much?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
16y ago
2 Answers
33
To answer your question, no, stock photos are not a viable source of income. You can make money off of it, just like some people who are able to write iPhone applications are able to make huge paydays; but in general the market is saturated, and unless you produce something that stands out amongst all the cruft, you won't be making much.
Think of it in terms of economics.
Supply and Demand.
Professional looking images required (in no particular order):
- Equipment
- Technique/Knowledge
- Skill
And back in the day, all three were fairly hard to come by. Camera equipment was expensive (especially digital), you hard to find someone willing to teach you the ropes, and it took a long time to learn. Now a days:
- Camera equipment costs necessary to produce professional looking images have dramatically decreased since the digital camera boom.
- Likewise, computing power has become more powerful, and much more affordable, and image editing software has become much easier to use
- The internet has made it incredibly easy to find information for learning how to produce quality images, as well as made it super easy to submit images for publication.
As such, the barrier to entry to producing quality images has been lifted nearly completely. With that, more and more people are able to produce nice images. One could say that stock photographs have become a commodity; there is no short supply of quality looking images.
Since the supply is very saturated, that drives the price down (while demand for stock photos has increased, it hasn't been to the scale as supply). Anyone with a digital camera and an internet connection can produce stock photos.
As Nick pointed out that as long as it doesn't cost you anything to submit your photos, you have nothing to lose.
This is outside your question, but if you want to make money off your photography, you're going to want to be creative and see what areas are underserved and target them. Assuming you are in the US, how about getting into real-estate photography--there is a huge glut of houses on the market and (at least when I was looking to buy a house) most have crap photos taken by real-estate agents. Another area, not for money necessarily--is to team up with animal shelters and do photos of the pets for adoption. Most shelters dont spend any time taking nice images, so volunteering your time will
- Increase your skill in pet photography
- Let you network and meet potential clients. After all they might want prof. photos done with their new family addition.
- Help with a great cause: helping find pets a forever place to live.
Originally by user170. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user170
16y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Usually, no—not as a meaningful or reliable source of income. Some photographers do make money from stock, but most contributors earn very little compared with the time and effort involved.
The main issue is saturation: it’s much easier than it used to be for many people to create technically good images, so supply is huge and competition is intense. To stand out, you generally need images that meet specific commercial needs, not just photos you happen to enjoy making as a hobby.
Stock photography is best thought of as its own job niche, with its own demands, uneven returns, and a lot of competition—especially in microstock. If you’re willing to invest time learning what sells and building a portfolio, you may earn something, but disappointment is common if you expect easy passive income.
If your goal is simply to offset hobby costs, alternatives like selling prints or exhibiting may fit better. If your goal is professional photography income, there are often stronger paths than stock alone.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI16y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
What are realistic ways for an amateur photographer to make extra money?
Should I sell my photos through stock sites, my own website, or both?
How can a beginner find photography assignments or start selling work?
How can an amateur photographer earn enough to support the hobby besides stock photography?
How can I license my landscape and landmark photos for postcards or gift products in the UK?