Is it reasonable to ask a nearby DSLR shooter to quiet their camera during an acoustic performance?
Asked 11/20/2017
7 views
2 answers
0
At a school concert in a large gym, I was making a personal audio recording on a handheld recorder while my daughter performed. Because the performers were far away and unamplified, noise from the audience mattered a lot.
A man seated in front of me used a DSLR with a telephoto lens throughout much of the 30-minute performance. The camera made autofocus beeps and loud shutter/mirror noise, sometimes in bursts, and that noise ended up dominating parts of my recording.
Would it have been reasonable to politely ask him to reduce the noise—such as turning off focus confirmation beeps or using a quieter shooting mode if available? More generally, what is the expected courtesy for photography during a quiet acoustic performance when camera noise may disturb nearby listeners?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
8y ago
2 Answers
8
The quantity of photos he was taking I don't think are unfair, however, I think he should have been more aware of the noise his camera makes. On most DSLRs, the focus beep can be disabled and the amount of noise the camera makes can be reduced. Some may also offer quieter shooting modes that avoid further noise.
When attending a performance, particularly one that is largely audio based, it is impolite to make more noise than necessary. This isn't some etiquette rule that requires you to be a professional photographer to know. It's simple common sense for attending an acoustic performance. Since it is almost certain that he could have accomplished taking his photos with much less noise, I think it would have been fair to ask if he could turn off the beeping and use whatever the quietest settings for his camera were. He may, however, have not been aware of the fact he could make his camera quieter, so I'd approach it politely and try to be instructive as to how to look for focus confirmation beeps or other similar settings.
Originally by user11392. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user11392
8y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes—politely asking would have been reasonable.
The main issue is audience etiquette, not whether either of you was acting “professionally.” At a quiet acoustic performance, it’s courteous to avoid making unnecessary noise that distracts nearby listeners. Camera shutter noise may be unavoidable on some DSLRs, but autofocus beeps are usually optional, and many cameras offer quieter shooting modes that reduce noise.
So a fair, non-confrontational request would have been to ask if he could turn off the beeps and use the quietest mode available. That said, if no one tells someone their camera is disruptive, they may genuinely not realize it’s a problem.
Also, when making an audience recording in a public venue, some ambient audience noise is always a risk; the recordist usually has to accommodate that reality. But that doesn’t make noisy camera use ideal etiquette.
In short: he should have minimized avoidable noise, and you would have been justified in politely asking.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI8y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
What camera options are nearly silent for photographing a wedding ceremony?
How can I reduce DSLR shutter noise in quiet settings?
How do I turn off continuous autofocus during video on a Nikon D3100?
Quiet, budget Nikon F-mount camera options for long-term timelapse
Is it normal for a Canon 600D to heat up during long video recording?