Is it okay to imitate other photographers while learning, and how do you build creativity?
Asked 3/15/2014
1 views
2 answers
0
I’m comfortable with the technical side of photography and can reproduce techniques I learn from tutorials, but I struggle to come up with original ideas of my own. Seeing other photographers’ work makes me feel like I’m only following their ideas rather than creating anything personal. Is it bad to imitate or mimic other photographers as part of learning? If that’s acceptable, what are some practical ways to develop creativity and a more personal style over time?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
12y ago
2 Answers
13
It is a good way to learn just how other photographers see, and a great way to get to know your gear to go out a try an make images that look like other photographers work. Many photographers do this (myself included( it's literally impossible to take the same image as someone else. Even in a group of photographers capturing the same scene, everyone will take an image that fit's what they want from the scene in front of them.
To take that one step further, start looking at other photographers work. That in itself will change the way you shoot because you will have been studying and filling your mind with great photography. Remember that technical information can not make art. All the gear in the world can't produce a single story. Stories are told within the frame by artistic means through subject framing and composition. The technical process is frosting on that cake, not the cake itself.
Do a 365. Make an image a day with a certain set of criteria. That will produce both frustration and creativity, so long as you don't quit. (never quit)
When it comes to creativity, remember that you are inherently creative. What you see and why you like it are unique to you. Be comfortable in that truth, then just go for it. Don't try to be creative, just be you. Be the original that you were made to be. Don't worry about originality, because no artist that worries about originality can ever be original, but if you simply try to tell the truth, you become original without any effort.
Originally by user21926. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user21926
12y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes—imitating other photographers can be a valid way to learn. Studying and recreating images helps you understand how others see, how they use technique, and how to control your gear. It’s also essentially impossible to make the exact same image; even people photographing the same scene will produce different results.
The key is to use imitation as practice, not as the end goal. Learn the method first, then try to take the underlying idea or mood and make it your own. Technical skill alone doesn’t create art; what matters is the story, feeling, or point of view inside the frame.
A practical way to build creativity is to work a subject in many different ways: shoot it multiple times, vary exposure, try brighter and darker versions, change your angle, tilt the camera, switch between wide and telephoto, and photograph from ground level, knee level, and eye level. Looking at a lot of strong photography can also reshape how you see.
In short: copying for study is fine. Keep practicing, experiment broadly, and gradually move from reproducing techniques to expressing your own interpretation.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI12y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
How can a new photographer develop artistic vision and a personal style for nature photography?
How can I make a childhood passport-photo collage in GIMP?
How can I practice flash portrait lighting without a model?
How should a photographer communicate with models or portrait subjects during a shoot?
Which GIMP book is best for learning photo editing concepts, not just step-by-step instructions?