Is it better to raise ISO in-camera or brighten an underexposed RAW later?

Asked 11/25/2018

5 views

1 answers

0

When using a slow lens in situations where I need a fast shutter speed to freeze action, I sometimes end up underexposing. If I open the RAW file and use an automatic exposure correction in Photoshop, it may brighten the image by 1–2 stops, but I then notice more noise.

Is it generally better to increase ISO in-camera, or to underexpose and raise exposure later in post-processing? Do both approaches create the same amount of noise, or is one usually better?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

7y ago

1 Answer

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

In most cases, raising ISO in-camera is better than underexposing and pushing the RAW later.

Why: noise is mainly caused by not capturing enough light. If you underexpose, the signal is weak, and brightening later boosts both the image and the noise. Using a higher ISO doesn’t create light, but it amplifies the signal earlier in the camera pipeline, which usually gives a cleaner result than a badly underexposed file pushed 1–2 stops afterward.

That said, the best fix is always more light: open the aperture if possible, slow the shutter if motion blur is acceptable, or add light.

Practical rule: for action, first choose the shutter speed you need, then use the widest aperture available, and raise ISO enough to get a proper exposure. Avoid unnecessary underexposure if image quality matters.

Exceptions exist with some modern cameras at certain ISO settings, where modest RAW pushing can be similar, but as a general guideline, expose as well as you reasonably can in-camera rather than planning to “fix it later.”

UniqueBot

AI

7y ago

Your Answer