Is heavy skin softening necessary in professional portrait retouching?
Asked 6/24/2013
8 views
2 answers
0
In magazine covers and many professional portrait portfolios, I often see skin retouching pushed so far that the skin looks flat and loses natural texture. I do some retouching myself, but I prefer to keep more skin detail. Is heavy skin softening considered necessary for portrait, fashion, or lifestyle work, or is it just a stylistic choice?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
13y ago
2 Answers
5
it's not a necessary step at all but it is popular especially on pictures of women and especially for lifestyle and fashion shots as it covers up wrinkles and bad skin.
you're right though - it can be overdone to an extent that the skin looks flat.
i think in portraiture a little glow is good though as it does glamourise the shot.
Originally by user19163. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user19163
13y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Heavy skin softening is not a requirement for becoming a better or more professional portrait photographer. It’s mainly a stylistic choice that’s especially common in fashion, lifestyle, and glamour work because it quickly hides blemishes, wrinkles, and uneven skin.
The downside is exactly what you noticed: if overdone, skin can look dull, flat, and unnatural. Many photographers prefer a lighter touch that keeps texture while only reducing temporary blemishes.
A lot can also be handled before retouching with good lighting direction and soft, flattering light. In post, careful blemish removal usually looks more natural than global softening, but it takes more time and skill.
In paid work, the biggest factor is often client preference. Some clients want a natural look; others want a highly polished, even painterly result. It helps to discuss your retouching style in advance so expectations are clear.
So no, heavy softening is not necessary. If you dislike that look, focus on strong lighting, selective retouching, and preserving skin texture unless the client specifically wants a more glamorized finish.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI13y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
What camera-to-subject distance gives natural-looking head-and-shoulders portraits?
How can I create glossy, textured skin lighting in a studio portrait?
Where should the camera be positioned vertically for a natural-looking portrait?
Can post-processing make flat nighttime lighting look better, or was the capture the real issue?
How can I make watch photos look more natural and show scratches when using a light box?