Is a prosumer DSLR a good choice for a beginner, or will it be harder to learn with?
Asked 12/20/2010
2 views
2 answers
0
I’m new to photography and am considering starting with a prosumer DSLR such as the Nikon D7000. I understand it will cost more than an entry-level camera, but are there other drawbacks for a beginner? In particular, will a more advanced camera add frustration or unnecessary complexity, or can it actually make learning easier?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
15y ago
2 Answers
58
On the contrary, I think these cameras are better for beginners, if your intention is really to begin — that is, to start from here and (as you say) get into photography.
The lower-priced entry-level cameras focus on fully-automatic modes, and emphasize ways of making the camera work without any thought from you. The biggest example is scene modes, which basically say "You want to take a picture of that? No problem! Turn the camera to that mode, and I'll handle the rest." And then what they do is a black box operation, from which it's hard to learn.
On the other hand, the complexity in higher-end cameras is there to make it easier for you to tell the camera what to do. You get separate dials for aperture and shutter speed, and a quick way to set ISO. You get a top LCD screen so you can glance down to see settings without turning on the distracting, bright, badly-placed main rear LCD screen. You get an easily-accessible metering mode switch, so you can use the right metering mode for the situation. (On entry-level cameras, this is usually an option buried in the menu, making it a set-and-forget thing rather than something easily switched for every situation.) There will be more settings you can customize, and one or more "user modes" which you can define, rather than trusting the camera to guess.
And on top of all that, you get a more solidly-built camera, and a better viewfinder, and (depending on model) the ability fine-tune autofocus on a per-lens basis.
So, while it's certainly not necessary to get into photography, it's definitely nice. And there's some certain threshold features that, once you're used to, you probably would never dream of living without. (The dual control dials, for example.)
Originally by user1943. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user1943
15y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
A prosumer DSLR isn’t necessarily a bad choice for a beginner. In some ways it can be better: higher-end bodies often give you faster, more direct control over aperture, shutter speed, and ISO, which can make learning the basics of exposure easier than relying on scene modes and full-auto settings.
That said, there are real downsides besides price. A more advanced camera can feel more complex, and many beginners simply don’t need all of its extra features to learn core photography skills. A basic DSLR can teach aperture, shutter speed, ISO, RAW vs. JPEG, and other fundamentals just as well.
Another practical disadvantage is size and weight. If the camera is bulky enough that you leave it at home, that matters more than extra capability.
So the tradeoff is this: a prosumer body may be more capable and give better direct controls, but an entry-level DSLR is often enough for learning and may be simpler, cheaper, and easier to carry. If your goal is to seriously learn photography, either can work; if convenience and budget matter most, simpler gear may be the better start.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI15y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Do you need a DSLR to learn photography, or can an advanced compact work?
Are 1/2.3-inch compact camera sensors always bad compared with a DSLR?
Which budget entry-level DSLRs offer auto exposure bracketing for HDR?
How should I choose between a DSLR, mirrorless camera, or compact as my first serious camera?
Is a single off-camera speedlight a good way to learn basic lighting, or should I buy a cheap studio kit?