Is a Canon T4i with a 75-300mm lens enough for night football photography?
Asked 8/26/2016
3 views
2 answers
0
I’m shooting football games at night with a Canon T4i and an EF 75-300mm lens, without flash. The overall photos are sometimes okay, but players’ faces often come out dark. Is this mainly an exposure/settings issue, or do I need a faster lens for better results under stadium lights?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
9y ago
2 Answers
3
Darkness is a matter of exposure. You cannot use the flash because players are too far for it to reach and, if it would, it would probably be disturbing to them.
While you can increase exposure or manually set it to get the desired brightness, this will force you to either increase ISO or decrease shutter-speed. Higher ISO means more noise and slower shutter-speed means blurry movement, which is usually undesirable for sports in general, other than for some artistic shots depicting movement.
What you can do is get a better lens. Mostly a brighter lens. Towards the telephoto end of the zoom, the lens you have has a dim F/5.6 aperture. Instead look for at least an F/4 lens, even F/2.8 if you can afford it. This will let in much more light, 2X and 4X respectively, and let you keep a high shutter-speed while getting a better exposure.
Canon has many prime lenses from 200mm to 400mm with F/2.8 or F/4 maximum aperture, although if you are shooting fast movement, a zoom makes it much easier to frame. Their 200-400mm F/4L is fantastic. You can also consider a third-party lens like the Sigma S 120-300mm F/2.8 DG OS HSM. It should be very suitable to your situation given its range and bright aperture.
Originally by user1620. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user1620
9y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
It may be partly settings, but your 75-300mm is a real limitation for night football. At the long end it’s only f/5.6, which lets in much less light than an f/4 or f/2.8 lens. In low stadium light, that often forces a compromise: raise ISO and accept more noise, or use a slower shutter and get motion blur.
For sports at night, shutter speed matters a lot. Around 1/1000s freezes action best; 1/800s is often acceptable; 1/500s tends to produce more blur. To maintain those speeds under the lights, a wider-aperture lens is usually needed.
So yes: a faster telephoto lens would help significantly, especially f/2.8, and even f/4 is an improvement over f/5.6. Also consider increasing ISO if you’re underexposing, and watch field lighting and shadows—sometimes faces are dark simply because helmets and player position block the light.
In short: the T4i can do it, but the 75-300mm is not ideal for night football. Better results usually come from a faster lens plus careful exposure settings.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI9y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Which lens range is better for photographing a high school marching band at night: 24-105mm or 70-200mm?
How should I set up a Canon 60D for shooting youth football at night under field lights?
What gear and settings do I need to photograph my son playing soccer with a Canon Rebel T3?
How can I get sharper indoor hockey photos and keep players' faces in focus?
Is a 70-200mm f/2.8 without image stabilization good for high school football and wrestling?