Infrared camera conversion: when should the removed filter be replaced with glass?
Asked 10/2/2014
1 views
2 answers
0
When converting a digital camera for infrared photography, the camera’s visible/IR-blocking filter is often removed. Some conversions replace it with clear glass, some install an IR-pass filter, and some appear to leave no glass in its place.
What practical difference is there between leaving the filter out and replacing it with clear glass? Does autofocus type matter—for example, can contrast-detect AF usually cope without replacement glass while phase-detect AF needs a specific replacement to keep focus accurate? Also, is it safe to leave the sensor surface uncovered inside the camera body?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
11y ago
2 Answers
4
For phase detection AF to work properly, the camera needs more than just a clear glass replacement for the removed filter, it needs a replacement of a different thickness.
IR rays don't focus on the same point as visible light, which is why lenses have (used to have?) a red dot to tell you how to adjust focus from the visible light distance to the correct distance for IR. So the AF on an unmodified phase detection AF camera will be incorrect for IR. However, during conversion it's possible to put in a replacement for the removed filter that changes the sensor stack's height (the technical term for the filter's thickness) so that the AF focus system works for IR!
Roger Cicala gets into the details of sensor stack height at The Glass in the Path: Sensor Stacks and Adapted Lenses. One company that does conversions and sets the sensor stack height correctly is LDP LLC (MaxMax.com).
Contrast detection AF shouldn't have a problem because it uses the image sensor itself, not separate AF sensors.
Originally by user29815. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user29815
11y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
The main issue is not just protection; it’s the optical path length to the sensor.
In an IR conversion, simply removing the original filter can change the sensor stack thickness. That affects where the image comes to focus. For phase-detect autofocus, this is especially important because IR light focuses at a different point than visible light, so an unmodified PDAF system will usually be off. A properly chosen replacement glass can shift the effective sensor position so autofocus is calibrated for IR.
So yes: cameras using phase-detect AF generally need more than “just empty space” where the filter was. They typically need a replacement with the right optical thickness, or AF accuracy will suffer.
Contrast-detect AF is less dependent on factory AF calibration because it focuses from the sensor image itself, so it is generally more tolerant of changes in the sensor stack.
As for leaving the sensor uncovered: even if the camera body is closed, removing the protective glass layer leaves the sensor more exposed and is generally not ideal. In practice, replacement glass or a dedicated IR-pass filter is commonly used both to maintain the optical path and to provide protection.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI11y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Why doesn't my Canon EOS 1000D record IR light after removing the IR-cut filter?
Can a full-spectrum converted Sony NEX be used for normal color photography with a filter?
Is DSLR infrared conversion safe, and should I use a service or do it myself?
Should you replace the hot mirror when converting a DSLR for infrared, and is full-spectrum more versatile?
Do near-infrared AF assist beams work with contrast-detect and Dual Pixel autofocus?