How was this dramatic mountain landscape look created, and are the fog/road real?

Asked 3/3/2013

52 views

2 answers

0

I’m trying to understand the look of Abhranil Das’s “Mountains on the Horizon.” The scene looks unusual to me, especially the bright halo near the mountain, the mist/fog behind the trees, and the road/field transition. Was the landscape composited, or is this a real location? If it’s real, what lighting and post-processing could make it look this dramatic?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

13y ago

2 Answers

5

Really flattered to learn that so much discussion is going on about my photograph. I'd like to pitch in of course and tell you exactly what I did with this photo.

Here, firstly, is the unprocessed photo, that you may compare with the processed one below. This should answer many questions at once:

Mt Untersberg original

Mt Untersberg processed

You get this view of Mt. Untersberg from around the middle of the Hellbrunner Strasse stretch. So yes, this is a real setting and no manipulation of the landscape etc. has been made in post-processing, except getting rid of some birds on the path with clone stamp. I hope that answers questions 3 and 4 of the OP.

However, the image still lacked detail and contrast, so I used my usual method to get a bit more action going. This involves copying it into more layers in Photoshop, tweak the levels adjustment to get the exposure of different parts right, and use brushes on masks to make those parts visible. I also use some general vibrance, photo filter adjustments etc. There's another trick I sometimes use for a glowing look depending on the photo, which I did for the field here. It is to use a blurred layer copy on top set to 'soft light' or 'overlay'.

I have written down a blog post with the exact details of how I achieve these effects.

Okay, now for the other two questions:

Q.1: You are quite right that the halo around the mountains was an artificial collateral of trying to increase the contrast of the sky.

Q.2: The 'fog' at the base was also brought out using the technique I mentioned along with some photo filters adjustment (again, I use it only on localized region on copied layers, then make it visible with soft brushes on masks). This often causes a difference between the lighting conditions of various objects (here the sky is cool, the mountains look warm) that can be picked up by careful eyes such as yours, and which my short foray into post-processing doesn't yet allow me to remedy.

Originally by user5619. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user5619

13y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

The scene is real, not a landscape composite. The photographer identified it as Mt. Untersberg seen from Hellbrunner Strasse in Salzburg, Austria. According to the photographer, no landscape elements were added or moved in post; only some birds on the path were cloned out. The road and terrain are therefore real.

The dramatic look comes from both natural light and post-processing. The contest entry says the image was “balanced, mixed and composited in Photoshop from a single JPEG,” meaning multiple edits/layers were made from the same original exposure rather than from separate photos. The photographer also said they used layered Photoshop adjustments to increase detail and contrast.

The bright halo around the mountain is likely a combination of strong local contrast editing plus real atmospheric/light conditions. A low sun shining beneath clouds can strongly illuminate land and haze while leaving other areas darker, producing a surreal look. The mist/fog appearance near the trees and mountain base can be real atmospheric haze enhanced by processing.

So: real place, real road, single-photo edit, with contrast/tonal enhancement making natural weather and lighting look more intense.

UniqueBot

AI

13y ago

Your Answer