How should I organize RAW files and JPEG exports in Lightroom on a laptop with limited space?
Asked 7/14/2011
4 views
2 answers
0
I’m new to shooting RAW and using Lightroom. Right now I import RAW files to a local folder, edit them, export JPEGs to my main photo album folder, add keywords/comments, and then copy the original RAW files to an external drive. Lightroom only knows about the import folder, not my album folder.
I’d like Lightroom to manage my library properly, but my laptop doesn’t have enough space to keep all RAW files locally. I also like having JPEGs available for easy use outside Lightroom.
What’s the best Lightroom workflow here? Should I import directly to the external drive so Lightroom tracks the RAW files there, then export JPEGs only when needed? If I export JPEGs to a separate album folder, how do ratings, keywords, and edits fit into that workflow?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
15y ago
2 Answers
15
It sounds like you're fighting Lightroom's natural workflow a bit. Here's my suggestion, which is pretty close to a "standard" workflow for Lightroom:
- Import your RAW files. As part of the import, you've got the option to move the files to another location -- that would be your external drive. Following the import, then, Lightroom knows about your photos, and the location it knows for those RAW files is the external drive.
- Keyword tagging and ranking in the Library module.
- Edit any photos you wish in the Develop module -- it's ok to swap this step with tagging if you'd rather do it in that order.
- Export your photos to your album folder.
At this point, you can disconnect your external drive and you'll still have the photos in your album. If you want to do any work with those photos, though, you'll have to have your external drive connected.
Regardless of whatever tuning you do to your workflow, you want to make sure that once photos become known to Lightroom, you're using Lightroom to manage moving those photos, if necessary. This is because Lightroom handles all of its manipulations and metadata as additions to your original photo (your RAW files). If you change the location of that RAW file in a way that Lightroom isn't aware of, you're going to end up having to help Lightroom find the new location for that file before it can continue.
Originally by user269. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user269
15y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
A better Lightroom workflow is to let Lightroom manage the RAW originals where they will permanently live—ideally on the external drive—right from import.
Typical approach:
- Import RAW files into Lightroom, moving/copying them directly to the external drive.
- Do your culling, rating, keywording, and editing in Lightroom.
- Export JPEGs only when you actually need them, either to a folder or via a publish service.
Key point: Lightroom does not edit the RAW file itself. Your edits, ratings, and keywords are stored in Lightroom’s catalog/metadata, so there’s no separate “save the RAW” step beyond backing it up.
If you export JPEGs to an album folder, those exports are derivative files; Lightroom’s main source of truth should still be the RAW files in the catalog. In general, you do not need to re-import exported JPEGs just to manage the same photos.
If you often need ready-made JPEGs, Lightroom publish services/smart collections can automate exports to specific folders in different sizes or qualities.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI15y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Should exported JPEGs be imported back into a Lightroom catalog?
How can I move Lightroom photos to another drive while preserving folder structure and edits?
How can I use one Lightroom catalog on a desktop and laptop without networking?
Can Lightroom batch-convert RAW files to JPEG without keeping them in the catalog?
How can I use Lightroom 5 on a laptop while keeping originals on an external drive?