How reliable are photography gear review sites like KenRockwell and byThom?
Asked 4/15/2011
5 views
2 answers
0
When researching a camera or lens purchase, I often find review sites such as KenRockwell.com and byThom.com near the top of search results. Some photographers find them useful, while others criticize them for being opinion-heavy, using affiliate links, offering limited sample images, or mixing in humor and satire. In general, how much weight should buyers give to review sites like these? What is the best way to judge whether an online gear reviewer is trustworthy?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
15y ago
2 Answers
39
I find that when it comes to stuff like reviews (including, but not limited to photography equipment), you probably don't want to put all your eggs in one basket for anything important.
If you look at two or three (or more) reviews, however, you should start to see some common themes emerging -- ie, the lens is soft wide-open, or it focuses slowly, or it's got great bokeh -- whatever. To the extent you start to see these attributes come up time and again for a given piece of equipment, you can start to be pretty sure there's something real there. If you do this a few times, you'll also start to have a good frame of reference for how reliable any given source of information is; so in the future, you'll have a pretty good feel for whether you want to start with Ken Rockwell, or whether you'd be better off starting with someone like DPReview.
The idea here is that any given review on even the most trusted site could be off, so don't rely on a single source of information unless it's a purchase you're comfortable taking a gamble on.
Originally by user269. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user269
15y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Use review sites as one input, not the final word. A single reviewer’s style, priorities, and biases can strongly shape conclusions, especially on subjective topics like rendering, handling, or value. The safest approach is to compare several sources and look for points that consistently repeat across them—such as softness wide open, slow autofocus, or especially pleasing bokeh. Repeated patterns are more likely to reflect real characteristics.
It’s also reasonable to judge a reviewer by context: are they clear that they’re giving personal opinions, do they separate facts from humor, and does their own photographic work inspire confidence? Popularity alone doesn’t prove reliability, and affiliate links don’t automatically invalidate a review, but they are a reminder to read critically.
So yes, sites like these can be useful, but they shouldn’t be treated as authoritative on their own. Cross-check multiple reviews, consider what matters for your own shooting, and if possible, try the gear yourself before buying.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI15y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
No related questions yet.