How much camera weight can a Canon super-telephoto lens mount safely support?

Asked 4/25/2016

1 views

2 answers

0

I want to attach a relatively heavy CCD camera, around 6–7 lb with accessories, to Canon super-telephoto lenses such as the EF 600mm f/4L IS II and EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II for astrophotography. The lens itself will be supported in a custom ring-and-dovetail rig on an equatorial mount, so the main concern is the load placed on the lens-to-camera mount, not the tripod foot. The setup moves slowly while tracking, but gravity will act on the camera at different angles as the mount slews and tracks. Is there a published maximum camera weight for the Canon EF lens mount on these lenses, or is the real issue torque rather than weight?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

10y ago

2 Answers

6

It's not just the weight of the camera that's a concern, but the torque that it will apply to the mounting ring on the lens (and in the camera, of course).

Torque is turning force, and it's calculated by multiplying force (weight, in this case) by distance from the center of rotation. So, if we guess that your camera is 4" deep from the mount to the back of the camera so that the center of mass is about 2" from the flange, and that the camera weighs 7 lbs, the torque at the mount would be around 14 in-lb. That's probably comparable to an EF 70-200 f/2.8 being mounted with no support: that lens weighs around 3 lbs and is about 8 in long, giving a torque of around 12 in-lb.

Even so, I'd want to support the camera for two reasons:

  • Safety. You don't want to take chances with a lens that costs $11K.

  • Stability. Putting a relatively heavy, unsupported object on the end of the lens will shift the center of mass of the whole system. Even if the mount itself is fine, expecting a rock solid connection to the equatorial mount through just one point might be asking too much of the lens' tripod foot. Connecting both camera and lens to a support system will help eliminate unwanted movement.

In the movie industry it's common to use a rail system as a chassis to assemble lens, body, and other camera components into a single unit. There's lots of good info online for DIY rail systems.

I just need to know what the acceptable limits are.

Reach out to Canon. If you're not already a Canon Professional Services member, you should be with a lens like that, and the CPS folks will be able to find out for certain whether you're pushing your luck with a 7 lb camera or if you're completely within bounds.

Reach out to the camera manufacturer. The thing you really care about is whether it's safe to mount the camera and filter wheel on your expensive lens -- you don't need to know about the actual limit so long as your use comes in under the limit. Considering that the manufacturer designed the camera to use an EF mount in the first place, they've probably done some research on the subject and may even have licensed the use of the EF connector from Canon, in which case they may have access to Canon's specifications for the hardware. At any rate, they should be able to tell you if it's safe to let the mount support the camera or if you need to provide additional support of some kind.

Originally by user4262. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user4262

10y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

There usually isn’t a published “maximum camera weight” for the EF mount. The more important factor is torque: camera weight multiplied by how far its center of mass sits behind the lens flange.

A 6–7 lb camera with its center of mass a couple of inches behind the mount creates torque in the same general range as some unsupported pro DSLR/lens combinations, so the mount can likely tolerate it. However, several answers note you may be nearing practical design limits, especially with changing orientation over time.

For your use, the safest approach is to support both the lens and the camera rather than letting the entire camera mass hang from the mount alone. That reduces stress on the lens mount, improves rigidity, and lowers the risk of damage if the rig is bumped or stops suddenly.

So: don’t think only in terms of weight; think torque and dynamic loads. If you can add rear camera support to your custom astrophotography rig, that would be the recommended solution.

UniqueBot

AI

10y ago

Your Answer