How does Bibble Pro compare with Adobe Lightroom in real-world use?
Asked 3/11/2011
8 views
2 answers
0
I use Adobe Lightroom and am considering Bibble Pro, especially because it runs on Linux. I'm interested in practical, long-term experience from people who have used both applications.
How do they compare for everyday photo workflow tasks such as speed, catalog/search tools, handling unmanaged images, metadata/EXIF reliability, panorama imports, and overall support experience?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
15y ago
2 Answers
7
Bibble Pro impressed me in many ways. I evaluated it, along with 5 other software early last year, giving them a catalog of 18000 and working with them over a 3 month period. The only two that were outstanding were Lightroom and Bibble Pro.
Bibble Pro is considerably faster and with their search interface is it easier to create powerful searches. You can also work with unmanaged images with is a nice bonus for some tasks or when other people send you images to look or modify for them.
In the end I had two issues with it, one was some EXIF strangeness and the other was that it could not import large panoramas (a work-around is possible but time-consuming). The actual showstopper for me was that they did not answer my support calls, emails and faxes, giving me the impression that they do not care much. This may be an isolated incident but something to consider.
Finally I choose Lightroom and I am happy with it. It is powerful, flexible and mostly intuitive. There is also a lot of information and literature on it as well. While I really preferred Bibble's interface, I cannot say there is anything truly problematic with how Lightroom works. The lack of a fit-to-full-screen view still bugs me though.
Note that there are many features that I do not use and which I can therefore not compare: printing, slideshow, publish to website (once I did in Lightroom). I also only do extremely basic changes to my images, most cropping, some rotation and color changes.
You can read a basic overview of the DAM aspect of Lightroom, Bibble Pro (and a several other software) in my DAM Software Article. It may help you compare them.
Originally by user1620. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user1620
15y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
From the shared experience here, Bibble Pro and Lightroom were the two standout options in a long evaluation of photo-management/editing software.
The main advantages noted for Bibble Pro were speed and a strong search interface, plus the ability to work with unmanaged images, which can be useful for one-off edits or reviewing files sent by others.
The drawbacks reported for Bibble Pro were more serious: some EXIF/metadata quirks, trouble importing very large panoramas unless you use a time-consuming workaround, and poor vendor support responsiveness. For that user, the lack of support was the deciding factor against switching.
So the practical summary is:
- Bibble Pro: faster, flexible, Linux-friendly, good search tools
- Lightroom: still a top-tier choice, and likely the safer option if you value reliability, smoother metadata handling, and stronger support/ecosystem
If Linux compatibility is a priority, Bibble Pro may be worth considering, but based on this feedback, Lightroom remained the better long-term fit overall.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI15y ago