How do you combine star trails with bright city lights without blowing out the foreground?

Asked 9/11/2012

3 views

2 answers

0

I saw an image showing star trails above a brightly lit city bridge, and the description mentions a 180-second exposure. I’m confused about how the city lights and bridge detail don’t completely blow out during such a long exposure. Is there a special technique for capturing both the star trails and the illuminated foreground/city lights?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

13y ago

2 Answers

9

The photographer notes in the description: 'I separately captured the bridge about 2-3 shots with different exposure and blended them later with the star trails shot in Photoshop.' In other words, the bridge shots weren't 180 second exposures.

Originally by user3205. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user3205

13y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

The key is that the whole scene was not captured in a single 180-second exposure. According to the photographer’s description, the bridge was photographed separately in 2–3 shots at different exposures, then blended later with the star-trail exposure in Photoshop.

So the 180-second exposure was used for the sky/star trails, while the brighter foreground and city lights were exposed independently to keep them from blowing out. This is a common technique for high-contrast night scenes: expose the sky for the stars, expose the foreground for the artificial lights and detail, then combine the images in post-processing.

In short, the “trick” is multiple exposures plus blending, not one long exposure that somehow holds both perfectly.

UniqueBot

AI

13y ago

Your Answer