How do mirrorless lenses compare with DSLR pro lenses for image quality?
Asked 3/28/2014
3 views
2 answers
0
I’m new to photography and trying to understand whether moving to a mirrorless system means giving up image quality. For example, how would lenses made for a camera like the Fujifilm X-T1 compare with Canon L-series lenses or similar DSLR lenses? Aside from lens selection and special-purpose options, is there any measurable quality loss with mirrorless, or are the main differences really about sensor size, low-light performance, depth of field, and portability?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
12y ago
2 Answers
5
Mirrorless cameras come in smaller bodies and can come with smaller sensors as well. Sony has a full frame mirrorless. Fuji has some APS-C size sensors, and then there is an array of micro-four thirds cameras, such as Olympus OMD line.
Everything is a tradeoff, but the smaller sensors let you use smaller lenses. Some of those lenses are incredibly good.
The fuji with APS-C sensor is well regarded as having image quality as good as a DSLR. The Olympus OMD EM1 is considered a high performer as well.
Typically, you'll see poorer low light performance with smaller sensors. However, the Olympus OMD EM1 is an excellent performer in the 95% case range for up to the advanced enthusiast.
I'm using the Olympus OMD EM1 with the Olympus 12-40 f/2.8 and it produces excellent images.
Samples (Olympus OMD EM1 with 12-40 2.8)
With the larger sensors, you get more shallow depth, because with a crop sensor, you need to be at a greater distance to achieve the same field of view, so if you're used to the DOF of an f/2.8 on a full frame, you'll need an f/1.4 to get the same DOF on a micro four thirds camera.
Other considerations are that the current MFT cameras aren't necessarily as good as DSLRs in the autofocus department, although the Oly OMD EM1 is remarkably fast and accurate. It's the perfect camera for me.
I used to carry a Canon 5D mk iii with L lenses. I sold all that gear for the OMD EM1 and have never looked back.
Originally by user10057. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user10057
12y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Mirrorless itself does not inherently reduce image quality. Lens quality is judged the same way as any other lens: sharpness, aberrations, contrast, etc. A good mirrorless lens can be excellent, just as a good DSLR lens can be excellent.
The bigger practical difference is usually sensor size, not the presence or absence of a mirror. In general:
- larger sensors tend to do better in low light
- larger sensors give shallower depth of field at the same framing/aperture
- smaller sensors allow smaller, lighter lenses
So the trade-off is often portability versus maximum low-light performance and background blur, rather than “mirrorless vs DSLR quality.” APS-C mirrorless systems like Fuji are widely regarded as capable of DSLR-level image quality, and Micro Four Thirds can also perform very well for most users.
Lens design also matters independently of system: some inexpensive lenses are great, some expensive ones are not, and primes often outperform similarly priced zooms. If you’re comparing systems, focus on sensor format, the lenses available for the focal lengths you need, and how much size/weight matters to you.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI12y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Can Nikon D-type F-mount lenses be adapted to a Fujifilm X-T1 with a Fotodiox Nikon F–FX adapter?
Can a mirrorless camera produce gallery-quality prints up to 20 inches wide?
Best non-prime travel zoom for a Canon APS-C DSLR if image quality matters most
Is the Canon EOS M a practical second or backup body for DSLR shooters?
How can you compare the image quality of two DSLR cameras?