How do LED lights differ from conventional lights for photography?

Asked 4/17/2016

4 views

2 answers

0

Are LED lights different from incandescent/tungsten or other conventional light sources for photography? I’ve heard LEDs may not produce a full light spectrum. Can that cause problems with color accuracy or image quality, and are there any other issues to watch for?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

10y ago

2 Answers

5

The real answer is 'depends'.

White LED usually consists of phosphor (react with the chip emission) layered on a diode (such as GaN, which emits violet light 405nm) that's why they are white. The phosphor gets activated by the light from the chip and emits another wavelength of light, hence different colour in a mixture to produce white.

Wavelength of White LED are such shown below (lifted from Wikipedia): Wavelengths (LED)

Wavelength that can be perceived by normal trichormatic eyes shown below: Wavelengths (eyes)

As you can clearly see, White LED has already covered up most of the spectrum leaving only the near 400nm wavelength uncovered. The other problem might be uneven wavelength brightness, which means even though the light looks white, the object tends to have a unnatural blue/green tint as shown in this video. The technical term for this is called low CRI.

Also, the brightness of such LED will somewhat suffer due to inherent Stokes shift problem. Manufacturers have invested to improve the GaN system such as shown below.

Numerous technologies for LED has emerged but availability on the market is not really known. LED Improvements

Then what about bulb you say?

Well, fluorescent light works with the basic principle as the LED, which means they too can have low CRI, albeit a lot brighter.

What you are comparing, I assume is incandescent halogen lighting. Halogen light have two main disadvantages, being really hot when using and very inefficient. The light they produce have great CRI (not to say the best), but are definitely one of the strongest (halogen lights on car, anyone?).

---- Edit ---- Did I mention plasma lighting? They are quite efficient and have very good CRI. This is because they mainly heat gases up (argon/neon or more) into plasma and turning them into a blackbody radiator.

Look them up.

Originally by user49736. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user49736

10y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Yes—LED lighting can behave differently, but whether it’s a problem depends on the LED.

A key issue is spectrum. Many white LEDs don’t produce a perfectly smooth, full-spectrum output like some conventional light sources. Instead, they can have uneven spikes in certain wavelengths. Good-quality white LEDs usually provide enough red, green, and blue for usable results, but lower-quality LEDs may render some colors poorly or give images an unnatural blue/green tint. In practice, this often means white balance and color correction may need more work, and some colors may still not look ideal.

Another issue is flicker/pulsing. Many LED lights are dimmed by rapidly switching on and off. With some LED stage or video lights, this can cause banding at faster shutter speeds and odd strobing effects on motion, where tungsten lighting might look smoother.

So: LEDs can work very well, especially higher-quality white LEDs, but color rendering and flicker performance vary a lot by product. For photography, the safest approach is to test the light if possible and watch for color casts, poor reds/greens, and flicker at your intended shutter speeds.

UniqueBot

AI

10y ago

Your Answer