How do I choose between a 14-42mm and 40-150mm lens for travel and sightseeing?
Asked 5/19/2013
1 views
2 answers
0
I'm new to interchangeable-lens cameras and use an Olympus E-P3 with two kit lenses: the 14-42mm and 40-150mm. Most of my practice so far has been with the 14-42mm, while the 40-150mm gave me nice background blur when I used it on plants in the garden.
I'm about to travel and will mostly photograph architecture, landscapes, and city scenes. I'd like to avoid changing lenses too often outdoors, so I'm trying to understand how to predict which lens will be more useful in different situations.
Can the 40-150mm work as a main sightseeing lens, or is the 14-42mm usually the better choice? Are there general rules for deciding between these focal ranges?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
13y ago
2 Answers
4
Those lenses have very little overlap, so you will generally known which one you need. They are not interchangeable for any given subject. There are subjects you can take with both but the result will not be the same except between 40 and 42mm, so the one you use is the one that gives the results you are looking for.
The 14-42mm is a wide-angle to medium lens. It is good to shoot things that are relatively large such as buildings, interiors, etc. You can rarely use a longer lens for such subject because you would need to back away which is often not possible. Imagine take a shot of a large temple, unless is is in reserve or park, you can rarely move far enough to see it all with a long lens.
The 40-150mm is a telephoto lens and shows a smaller angle-of-view. It is used to pick out details, such as a person's face for a portrait, as opposed to a full-body image which is easier with the wider lens. Again, many times you cannot compensate by moving yourself closer to the subject. Doing so for a person also results in an unflattering perspective which is why portraits are rarely shot with a wide-angle lens.
The only thing to minimize lens changes is to buy a Zuiko 14-150mm which covers the whole range of both your lenses but you will lose some image quality by doing so. I've covered this choice explicitly in my M.Zuiko lens round-up article.
Originally by user1620. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user1620
13y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
These two lenses do different jobs, so neither replaces the other.
The 14-42mm is your general sightseeing lens. On Micro Four Thirds, it gives a field of view roughly like 28-84mm on full frame, which is suited to streets, buildings, interiors, and landscapes. For large subjects like temples or architecture, a wider lens is often necessary because you may not be able to step back far enough.
The 40-150mm is a telephoto (about 80-300mm equivalent). It narrows the angle of view, making it useful for isolating distant details, tighter compositions, and portraits, and it can help blur backgrounds more easily.
For travel focused on architecture and broad scenes, the 14-42mm will usually be the more practical primary lens. Bring the 40-150mm when you want to pick out distant subjects or details.
A good rule: choose based on the shot you want, not the lens label. Wide/normal focal lengths show more of the scene; telephoto focal lengths show less and emphasize specific parts of it. With practice, you’ll start recognizing which field of view matches what you see.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI13y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Why is my Olympus PEN intermittently overexposing photos with one lens?
Why choose the Olympus 40-150mm over the 14-150mm besides size and price?
How important is lens stabilization for a 40–150mm lens on a Panasonic Micro Four Thirds body?
Can I adapt a Nikon F-mount Tamron 70-300mm lens to an Olympus OM-D E-M10?
How do I choose a polarizing filter for a Micro Four Thirds camera?