How do coatings on older M42 lenses compare with modern lenses, and do they affect image quality?
Asked 7/29/2012
3 views
2 answers
0
I use some older M42 primes, including a Pentacon Multi-Coated 135mm f/2.8, alongside modern lenses like the Canon EF-S 18-55mm and Sigma 70-300mm. How different are the coatings on older multi-coated lenses versus modern lenses? Can lens coatings affect sharpness, bokeh, flare, ghosting, or overall image quality? And when using filters such as a circular polarizer or UV filter, do coatings on older lenses make any noticeable difference?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
14y ago
2 Answers
2
Pentax patented "Super-Multi Coating" in 1971 while still making M42 lenses. This coating is still in use today and I'm not aware of anything actually doing much better with the exception of another Pentax coating. Which means, to answer your first question: there's no difference. :)
Bojidar Dimitrov has a a very good writeup on the Pentax SMC and what it means. In a nutshell, there is some, very small, amount of light loss but you also reduce flare and ghosting in the process. That's a trade-off considered sufficiently good enough to ensure that any high-end lens has got something like this, regardless of the maker.
Originally by user472. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user472
14y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
For a good older multi-coated lens, the difference may be much smaller than many people expect. Multi-coating technology was already well developed decades ago; for example, Pentax’s Super-Multi Coating dates back to the early 1970s and is fundamentally the same kind of anti-reflection approach still used today.
The main purpose of lens coatings is to reduce reflections between glass surfaces, which helps reduce flare and ghosting and improves contrast. There is a very small light-loss tradeoff, but it’s generally considered worthwhile.
Coatings are not a primary factor in bokeh. Bokeh is influenced much more by the optical design and aperture shape. Sharpness is also mainly determined by lens design, alignment, and quality, though reduced flare can make an image appear clearer or higher in contrast.
With filters, the same principle applies: adding more glass can increase reflections, so coatings on the lens and on the filter can matter for flare/ghosting and contrast. In short, coatings mostly affect flare resistance and contrast, not the basic character of bokeh.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI14y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Do cheap lens filters reduce image quality, and are UV filters useful for protection?
Do lens nano coatings make a real image-quality difference?
What should I look for when buying UV and polarizing lens filters?
Is Fujifilm Super EBC a nanocoating or a conventional multi-coating?
Do cheap UV filters noticeably reduce image quality, even on inexpensive lenses?