How did calotype negatives become translucent enough for contact printing?
Asked 12/11/2017
3 views
2 answers
0
I’m studying early photographic processes such as the calotype and cyanotype. One key advantage was that a single negative could be used to make multiple positive prints by contact printing. For that to work, the negative has to transmit light.
What made a calotype negative translucent enough for printing? Was the paper itself specially translucent, or did the chemistry/development process make it translucent?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
8y ago
2 Answers
5
Talbot bathed paper sheets in a solution of silver nitrate and then potassium iodide. He then “washed” the paper with a mix of gallic acid and silver nitrate. The paper was then exposed in the camera. The exposed paper was bathed again in this wash solution he called “gallo-nitrate of silver”. He then fixed the image (rendered permanent), with a hot solution of hypo (sodium thiosulfate) (Patent # 8842 Feb 8th 1841. The pictures were printed (converted to positives) by his wife. The print paper was sensitized with silver chloride. This sensitized paper was placed in a frame. This sandwiched the print-out paper under the paper negative, while a cover glass kept all in contact. The frame was taken out into the sunlight. The exposures ranged from a few minutes to an hour or more. It took brilliant sunlight to penetrate through the negative and expose the print paper. A visible image was formed -- no need to develop. This image was fixed, washed and dried.
Originally by user44949. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user44949
8y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
A calotype negative was usually made on paper, so it was never as clear as a glass negative. The “translucent” part mainly came from using fairly thin writing paper and then sensitizing, developing, and fixing it so the image consisted of silver compounds embedded in the paper fibers. Light could still pass through the sheet, especially in the lighter areas of the negative, which was enough for contact printing.
So it was not that the paper became transparent in the modern sense. Rather, a suitably thin paper negative transmitted enough light to print another sheet placed directly beneath it in a contact frame. The darker image areas blocked more light; the lighter areas passed more light, creating the positive print.
In Talbot’s process, the paper was sensitized with silver nitrate and potassium iodide, developed with gallic acid and silver nitrate (“gallo-nitrate of silver”), then fixed with hypo (sodium thiosulfate). The resulting paper negative could then be pressed against silver-chloride printing paper under glass and exposed to sunlight for minutes to much longer, depending on conditions.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI8y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
How can negative film or paper be processed to produce a positive image?
Why did early photographs require very long exposure times?
Why did straight photography overtake pictorialism, and does that debate matter in the digital era?
What processing chemistry does expired Agfacolor 80S color negative film use?
What’s the simplest photosensitive material I can make at home for a pinhole camera?