How can I use a gray reference card to set white balance and brightness for scientific RAW color analysis?
Asked 12/25/2017
6 views
2 answers
0
I’m photographing a subject for color analysis and included a reference gray card. The card is specified as approximately L*=70, a*=0, b*=0 under standard conditions. In my RAW workflow, I want to use that card as a reference.
Is it correct to adjust exposure until the sampled patch reads L*=70? Can I directly enter a target Lab* value in a RAW converter to calibrate the image? I’m aiming for accurate, repeatable color rather than a visually pleasing result.
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
8y ago
2 Answers
20
Sounds a bit iffy to me... A card, by itself, DOESN'T have a fixed L*a*b* colour - that's a product of the reflectivity of the card at different wavelengths and the intensity and wavelength distribution of the illumination. In the dark, L* will be 0. Light it with a coloured light and your a*b* will change. Light it with a "white" light with a different wavelength distribution and your a*b* may change due to metamerism. Light it with a different colour temperature and things will change. Change the brightness of the illumination or the distance or angle of the card relative to the light source and your L* will change.
However, assuming you're taking the picture under the correct standard lighting that your original card L*a*b* values were measured under (Which may well be different from natural light or camera flash - commercial printing often uses D50), And assuming that what you're interested in falls in the linear portion of the sensor response in all channels (anti blooming sensors start discarding some of the charge as the pixel well fills up), then you can probably get away with tweaking the exposure level to get the card to match your desired L* values. But be aware that even if you're using standard lighting, your L* value will vary based on distance and angle to the light source - and both brightness and colour may vary due to additional light reflected onto that part of the scene from surrounding objects.
But the usual way of measuring colours when accuracy is important is to use something called a spectrophotometer - these are usually contact (or near contact) instruments that measure the reflectivity of the target patch across a whole range of wavelengths, which also allows them to calculate accurate XYZ colour values, rather than trying to work out an accurate colour from RGB filtered samples alone, which don't always get it right (as anyone who has tried photographing bluebells will probably have noticed). This is why professionally generated ICC colour profiles normally use a spectrophotometer to meaure printed colour patches.
Which isn't to say you can't do useful things from a photo - you just have to be aware of the issues and limitations.
Originally by user61668. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user61668
8y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Not reliably with a normal RAW workflow alone. A gray card does not have one fixed Lab* value in every photo: its measured Lab* depends on the illuminant, intensity, angle, and the camera/profile used. So simply moving the exposure slider until the patch reads L*=70 is only meaningful if your lighting matches the standard under which that card’s value was specified and your whole workflow is color-managed.
Use the gray card primarily to neutralize color cast (set white balance so a*=0, b*=0 as closely as possible), not as a universal guarantee of L*=70. Adjusting exposure can help match brightness, but it is not a complete calibration method by itself.
For scientific or reproduction work, you need a scene-referred workflow: controlled, known illumination, careful capture, and a calibrated/profiled conversion process. Typical photographic RAW/JPEG rendering is designed to make images look pleasing, not strictly color-accurate. If you need dependable Lab matching, use standardized lighting and a proper color target/profile workflow rather than relying on a single exposure adjustment in Camera Raw.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI8y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
How can I white-balance using white, gray, and black reference cards mathematically?
How should I use a gray card when color-correcting scans in Photoshop?
How do RGB values on a QPcard 201 gray patch translate to percent gray?
How do I interpret Photoshop histogram mean values for Lab images?
How does Lightroom’s gray-card white balance work, and why doesn’t subtracting RGB from 128 match it?