How can I tell whether a lens is wide-angle or macro from focal length and sensor size?
Asked 7/9/2021
6 views
2 answers
0
I have a device with three lenses. One is my reference lens, and the other two may be wide-angle, macro, or possibly just the same as the reference lens.
I know the sensor width and focal length for each lens, and I’ve been estimating field of view with:
field_of_view = 2 * arctan(sensor_width / (2 * focal_length))
Then I compare each lens to the reference lens: if the field of view is about 10% larger, I call it wide-angle; if it is smaller, I call it macro. I suspect this is not the right way to classify them.
What is the correct way to determine whether a lens is wide-angle or macro? Is field of view enough, or do I need something else?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
4y ago
2 Answers
4
For valid reason, which I will explain later, the “normal” focal length for any size camera is a focal length that is approximately the same length as the diagonal measure of its format size. Additionally, the aspect ratio of most rectangular format cameras is 3÷2 = 1.5. In other words, the length is 1.5 times the height.
If you mount a lens, focal length equal to the diagonal measure, the angle of view delivered is 53°. This is the most often quoted angle of view, somewhat like the fact that TV sets are sold by their diagonal measure.
If the camera’s aspect ratio is 3:2, and the lens focal length equals the diagonal measure, the angle of view, camera held horizontally will be approximately 45°.
A lens is generally considered to be wide-angle if its focal length is about 70% of “normal” or shorter. A lens twice “normal” or longer falls into the realm of telephoto.
Why is a “normal” lens one that is about equal to the hypotenuse of the format rectangle?
All lenses project a circular image. Only the central portion of this image is suitable photographically. Additionally, this image is vignetted (a dimming of the edges). The central portion is called “the “circle of good definition”. For these reasons, the camera masks off this circular image, creating a rectangular format or frame size.
Now the rest of the story: We see with our eye/brain combination. We perceive what we call “the human perspective”. This is the 3D vision we are blessed with. We judge the relationships of objects by how we perceive them as to their size and distance. A “normal” lens is one that roughly replicates the “human perspective”.
If we were to view a vista through a glass windowpane, we can trace the outline of objects on the glass with wax pencil. We can also image this scenery using a camera. We then view the picture we have made. If we view this image from a distance equal to the focal length of the taking lens, we will perceive that this image replicates the “human perspective”.
Such a viewing distance is likely impossible given that today’s cameras are small devices fitted with short lenses -- plus the closest we can focus with our unaided eye is 6 inches / 150mm. Also, we tend to look at pictures from a distance about equal to their diagonal measure.
Suppose you take a picture with a full frame 35mm camera and view an 8x10 print made from that image. The 8x10 inch print is an enlargement, magnification 8X. To view a picture and perceive via the “human perspective”, the math is --- viewing distance is the focal length of taking lens multiplied by magnification. For this image, the viewing distance for a “normal” 50mm lens is 50 X 8 = 400mm = 16 inches, about normal reading distance. The APS-C requires 12X magnification, the normal lens is 30mm thus 30 X 12 = 360mm = 14 inches viewing distance. See how this all works out to the “human perspective”.
The macro lens is one that is optimized to work in close, we are talking live-size = 1:1 meaning magnification 1. No such formula, thus the lens specifications.
Originally by user44949. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user44949
4y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Your field-of-view calculation is fine for comparing lenses, but it only helps classify angle of view, not whether a lens is macro.
For wide/normal/long classification, compare focal length to the sensor diagonal, not just to another lens. A lens is generally:
- wide-angle if its focal length is shorter than the sensor/image diagonal
- normal if it is about equal to the diagonal
- long/narrow-angle if it is longer than the diagonal
Using angle of view works too; these categories are commonly defined by angular field of view.
Macro is different: it is not defined by focal length or field of view. A macro lens is defined by magnification at close focus:
magnification = image size on sensor / actual subject size
True macro is generally around 1:1 magnification (1.0×), though slightly less or more may still be described as macro. So a lens with a narrower field of view is not necessarily macro; it may just be a longer-focal-length lens.
In short: use focal length or field of view to identify wide/normal/narrow lenses, but use maximum magnification (or minimum focus distance plus magnification specs) to identify macro capability.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI4y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Should crop factor be used when calculating camera field of view?
Why are lenses specified by focal length rather than field of view?
How do I calculate a smartphone camera’s angle of view and subject distance correctly?
Can small sensors achieve the same wide field of view as full frame?
How were field of view and lens types described before 35mm equivalence became common?