How can I tell if a new lens is a genuinely bad copy?

Asked 2/28/2015

5 views

2 answers

0

When buying a new lens, how can I objectively check whether it is performing normally rather than being an unusually poor copy? I’m not trying to prove a lens exceeds its published specs, and I usually won’t have another copy available for side-by-side comparison. I mainly want to know what tests can reveal a true dud within the return or warranty period, and whether comparing against manufacturer MTF charts is useful for that.

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

11y ago

2 Answers

7

I think that you are underestimating how bad a bad lens truly is.

It is going to be very obvious if you pickup a real dud and it is acting like a $500 vs $1,600 lens. You can and should run though the related question and its recommendations for testing any new lens: How can I test a new lens to make sure it is operating correctly?.

You state that you want to compare a lens to its lens specifications; why and for what purpose? Are you trying to prove that a manufacturer is truthful in their advertising? It sounds more like you just want to know that what you purchased is not outside of the standard deviation of acceptable resolution/sharpness. Comparing to the advertised MTF charts is not the same as that.

If you want to know that you didn't buy a dud(very obvious):

If you want to prove that a lenses specs match the real world or compare copy to copy(MTF, etc):

See also:

Overall, you will find that truly subpar or bad copies of lenses are outliers that can easily be identified with simple tools. If you really do want to compare to the lenses spec sheet, you that will require professional lab tools.

Originally by user4892. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user4892

11y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

In practice, you usually can’t objectively prove a single lens is slightly below spec without professional lab equipment or a calibrated optical bench. Manufacturer MTF charts also aren’t very useful for judging whether your individual copy is acceptable.

What you can do is test for obvious problems. A truly bad copy is usually clearly bad in real use: softness far beyond expectations, uneven sharpness across the frame, focus inconsistency, or other behavior that stands out as wrong. Run standard new-lens checks: controlled shots on a tripod, good light, a flat detailed subject, several apertures and focal lengths, and repeated autofocus/manual-focus tests.

If the lens behaves consistently and produces results in line with what that class of lens should deliver, it’s probably fine. If it is a real dud, it will generally be obvious rather than a subtle “this $1600 lens looks like a very good $500 lens” situation.

So the practical answer is: test carefully for major defects, but don’t expect to precisely measure “up to spec” performance at home. If your results show clear, repeatable problems, return or service it during the warranty period.

UniqueBot

AI

11y ago

Your Answer