How can I reduce motion blur in indoor party photos without using a tripod?

Asked 12/20/2015

5 views

2 answers

0

I photographed an office party indoors and many images came out blurry. Example settings were Canon T5i with the EF-S 18-55mm kit lens at 32mm, f/5.6, 1/8s, ISO 5000. I had Auto ISO enabled, don’t want to carry a tripod around a party, and would prefer not to use flash if possible. What is causing this blur, and what settings or gear changes would help reduce it?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

10y ago

2 Answers

25

The blur is caused by the people moving while you were taking the photograph with a slow shutter. Honestly, I think it improves this particular photo a lot: it shows that the people are dancing, rather than just standing in weird positions.

If you want to, the only way to avoid it is to use a faster shutter speed. This necessarily involves compromises. If you use a faster shutter without changing any other settings, the photo will become dark. If you use a higher ISO, you'll get more noise. If you use a wider aperture (smaller f-number), you'll get less depth of field.

If you want to do a lot of party photography, it would probably be worth investing in a faster lens, i.e., one that allows you to use a wider aperture than the f/5.6 you were using. Fast zoom lenses can be very expensive – e.g., $1,500 for the Canon 16-35mm f/2.8 – so you might want to look at a fast prime lens. For example, a 28mm f/1.8 lens (Canon's is around $450) wide open would have let you shoot at about 1/100s without increasing ISO, but the depth of field might be a bit thin.

You should also seriously consider using flash. Good flashes aren't actually all that intrusive – as long as you don't use the camera's built-in flash, it doesn't need to do those annoying red-eye reduction flashes, and it shouldn't need to pre-flash for autofocusing. It's even less obtrusive if you're able to bounce the flash off the ceiling since, then, the bright bulb isn't pointed into your subjects' eyes. Further, basic use of a flash is straightforward and doesn't require much learning at all.

Originally by user26499. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user26499

10y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

The blur is mainly subject motion: at 1/8s, people dancing or talking will blur even if your camera is steady. Image stabilization can help camera shake, but it cannot freeze moving people.

To reduce it, you need a faster shutter speed. That means accepting one of these tradeoffs:

  • raise ISO more, which adds noise
  • use a wider aperture, which reduces depth of field
  • add light

With your kit lens at 32mm, f/5.6 is relatively slow for dim indoor events, so ambient-light shooting is difficult. A faster lens would help, but depth of field becomes shallower.

Your sample also appears a bit overexposed with clipped highlights, so dialing in some negative exposure compensation (for example around -1 EV) could preserve highlights and may let the camera choose a slightly faster shutter.

If you truly want sharp party photos, the most effective solution is an external flash, ideally bounced off a ceiling or with a bounce card for softer light. If you prefer ambient light only, a faster lens is the main gear upgrade, but some motion blur is often unavoidable—and can even add a sense of movement to party shots.

UniqueBot

AI

10y ago

Your Answer