How can I photograph ants in macro with a Nikon D90 without buying a 105mm macro lens?
Asked 1/17/2013
1 views
2 answers
0
I have a Nikon D90, plus a tripod and remote shutter release, and I’d like to take close-up photos of ants. I’m not ready to buy the Nikkor 105mm Micro lens yet. What gear is worth considering instead for ant macro photography? Are extension tubes, a shorter macro lens, or filters useful? What matters most for getting sharp results on such small, moving subjects?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
13y ago
2 Answers
6
If you don't want to use a macro lens, you can try extension tubes, although a macro lens with auto-focus will be easier to use.
A tripod and remote shutter won't be much help if you want to get close to the level of a single ant. At that size, the depth of field will be so small that you will need to react on the fly to the ant's movement. You'll be lying down on your belly trying to get one in proper focus, being surprised how fast those buggers move at that scale.
If you are willing to focus on a small part of a ant hill or something and wait for a ant to stumble along just at the right spot, then the tripod will work. If you don't really want down to 1:1 magnification and want a wider field to catch a bunch of ants doing something, then the tripod may again be useful. However, that's not really "macro" then, although it may be too close for your existing lens. Extension tubes can be a reasonable option at that range.
It will also help if you can arrange for the scene to be as bright as possible. If this is outdoors, do it with sunlight if possible. Otherwise, add lighting if possible. You will need a small aperture to get reasonable depth of field, and you're already 2 f-stops down at 1:1 magnification. As much light as you can get will be useful to allow for as fast a shutter speed as possible.
Originally by user7603. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user7603
13y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
You don’t need the 105mm Micro as the only option. For a lower-cost start, extension tubes are a common choice and let you use a lens you already own, especially a fast prime. A dedicated macro lens will usually be easier to use, though; on a Nikon DX body, a 60mm macro is also a sensible option.
For ants specifically, the biggest challenge is not just magnification but depth of field and motion. At very close distances, depth of field becomes extremely thin, and ants move fast, so a tripod and remote release often help less than expected unless you pre-focus on a spot and wait for an ant to pass through it.
Good light is critical. More light helps you use smaller apertures for more depth of field and faster shutter speeds to reduce blur. Handheld shooting is often more practical than a tripod for active insects.
In short: start with extension tubes if you want to experiment cheaply, consider a 60mm or 105mm macro lens if you want a more dedicated solution, and prioritize strong lighting and technique over filters.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI13y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Can the Nikon D3200 with 18-105mm VR shoot insects and close-up macro photos?
For casual macro on a Canon 40D, are extension tubes better than a close-up filter?
How do I choose extension tubes for DSLR macro photography?
Can the Nikon D90 do focus bracketing with the AF-S Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8?
Can extension tubes be used with a 70-200mm telephoto lens?