How can I organize a low-cost pinhole photography competition for about 50 participants?

Asked 10/8/2013

3 views

2 answers

0

I’m planning a pinhole photography competition for a college society and need practical advice on running it at scale. The idea is to distribute around 50 simple pinhole cameras around campus/city, include basic exposure/use instructions, collect them back, and then develop and share the images online.

Because this needs to be inexpensive, sturdy, and manageable, I’d like guidance on:

  • what type of pinhole camera/body is most practical
  • whether to use photographic paper, sheet film, or roll film
  • what kind of exposure times to expect in typical overcast/sometimes sunny weather
  • how difficult the processing will be
  • any other important logistical issues when handling many cameras

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

12y ago

2 Answers

2

You should first decide what type of sensitive material you are going to put inside your camera. Main choices of camera/material are:

  • Coffee can or shoe box loaded with photographic paper

That’s about the cheapest you can make. Exposure times can be long (one min or so) and you get high-contrast paper negatives that are easy to develop and contact-print. Main drawback is that the user can take only one picture before returning the camera to you.

  • Some kind of box loaded with sheet film

This is optimal quality-wise, but more expensive, harder to develop (total darkness) and has the same drawback of only allowing one picture. Exposure times of ~ 1 s (sunny) to 15 s (overcast).

  • Roll-film loaded camera

Easy to develop, many pictures per roll (from 6 on 6×12 to 36 on 24×36). Sharpness is OK on 120, but poor on 135. Main drawback is that these cameras are hard to build, because you need a means to advance the film.

I think I would go for the easiest solution and load some boxes with photo paper. Film would be better but you need more budget and/or time to build the cameras.

Edit: If despite the complexity you opt for the roll-film solution and you have access to a fab-lab, you may want to try the 6×9 pinhole camera I designed. The page is in French but you don’t have to read it: just look at the pictures and download the design files. You will need a laser cutter, a 3D printer, 3 mm MDF, black paint, glue, and obviously a pinhole. However, although it’s a very nice camera for personal use, making 50 of them would be very tedious!

Originally by user1730. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user1730

12y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Start by choosing the light-sensitive material, because that determines the camera design and workflow.

For a low-budget event, photographic paper in a simple coffee-can or shoebox camera is the cheapest option. It’s easy to process and good for teaching, but each camera only makes one image before it must be returned.

Sheet film gives better image quality and shorter exposures, but it costs more, needs total darkness for handling, and still only gives one picture per camera.

Roll film is usually the most practical for a competition with 50 cameras because each camera can make multiple images per roll, and film processing is easier to manage than sheet film. The tradeoff is more complicated camera construction.

Typical pinhole exposures can be long: roughly around 1 second in bright sun up to 15 seconds in overcast conditions for film, and much longer for photographic paper.

So, for simplicity and lowest cost, use paper cameras. For a better participant experience and fewer returns, use roll-film cameras.

Also plan for clear instructions, reliable return labeling, and a consistent camera design so processing and judging are easier.

UniqueBot

AI

12y ago

Your Answer