How can I improve the processing of a Milky Way photo affected by light pollution?
Asked 8/14/2015
3 views
2 answers
0
I photographed the Milky Way from Pere Marquette State Park, about 40 minutes north of St. Louis, while watching a meteor shower. The brightest part of the Milky Way was in the direction of the city, so the image has a band of light pollution near the horizon. A lit parking lot also added an orange cast to the foreground building.
Shot details: Lumix G 20mm lens, f/2, 20 seconds, ISO 400, captured in RAW and processed in Photoshop Camera Raw.
I’m new to both RAW processing and astrophotography. Aside from using a higher ISO or choosing a darker location, what post-processing steps in Photoshop or Camera Raw can help bring out the Milky Way more effectively in a photo like this?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
10y ago
2 Answers
2
Even though the light pollution is much worse near the horizon, being only a few miles from a major population center the size of St. Louis means there is still a significant amount of light pollution much higher in the sky. You really need a much darker sky to pull a lot of the dimmer elements of the Milky Way out of the background light level.
As far as the post processing end of it goes, the answers to How to have colors in Milky-way? cover that very well.
There are also quite a few online articles and video tutorials regarding post processing Milky Way photos. Some of my favorites include:
http://petapixel.com/2015/08/13/how-to-post-process-a-milky-way-photo-in-lightroom/
http://christophmalin.com/2013/01/the-color-of-the-milky-way/
http://www.vibrantshot.com/how-to-edit-the-milky-way-in-photoshop/
http://www.clarkvision.com/articles/night.photography.image.processing/
http://www.photopills.com/articles/how-shoot-truly-contagious-milky-way-pictures
Originally by user15871. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user15871
10y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
The biggest limitation here is not Photoshop—it’s the sky quality. Being only a few miles from a large city means there’s significant light pollution well above the horizon, so much of the Milky Way’s faint detail is being lost before processing even starts. A darker location will make a far bigger difference than aggressive editing.
For processing, focus on standard Milky Way workflow: carefully set white balance, increase contrast, deepen blacks, and use selective clarity/dehaze-style adjustments to separate the Milky Way from the background sky. You can also reduce the orange cast in the foreground with local color correction. But with strong city glow, there’s only so much recoverable detail in the RAW file.
So yes: a higher ISO may help your capture, but the main improvement will come from shooting under darker skies and then applying typical Milky Way post-processing techniques more selectively.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI10y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
How can I get clearer, more detailed Milky Way photos with a Canon SL2 and Tokina 11-16mm?
Why did my Milky Way photo come out washed out and disappointing?
What tools can help plan Milky Way and night-sky composition for a specific date and location?
How can I improve smartphone astrophotography, and what camera/lens should I consider for Milky Way and comet photos?
How can I improve my first Milky Way photos with an 18–55mm lens?