How can I get this bright, airy look with soft shadows but defined dark tones?
Asked 2/13/2016
5 views
2 answers
0
I’m trying to understand the look in a reference image that appears very sharp and crisp, but also slightly hazy/airy. The shadows look faint and lifted, yet darker areas still seem defined, and the highlights are bright without feeling harsh.
Compared with a more natural-looking version of the same scene, what camera or editing choices would create this effect? I’m especially interested in whether this comes more from exposure, white balance, depth of field/lens choice, lighting, or post-processing adjustments.
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
10y ago
2 Answers
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Based on the comparisons in the answers, the look seems to come from a mix of capture and editing:
- slightly brighter exposure / mild overexposure
- more neutral white balance (less yellow cast)
- shallower depth of field, likely from a wider aperture or a longer focal length / greater camera distance
- possibly additional light from above or another direction
In post, the effect is largely a tonal adjustment: lower highlights, raise shadows and whites, keep blacks somewhat reduced but still present, and back off contrast a little. One answer got close by pulling highlights down strongly, lifting shadows and whites, lowering blacks moderately, and reducing contrast. Small color tweaks (especially yellow/orange) can also help.
So the “soft shadows but defined darks” look is essentially lifted shadow tones with preserved black point and controlled highlights. Shooting RAW will help because it gives more room to recover shadows and fine-tune exposure and white balance afterward.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI10y ago
0
I see a few things:
The first picture has a neutral white balance, whereas the second picture has a yellowish white balance.
The first picture is slightly overexposed, whereas the second is normally or maybe slightly underexposed.
The first picture has a shallow depth of field, maybe f/1.8 or f/2.8, whereas the second picture has a much deeper depth of field.
Originally by user22895. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user22895
10y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
How can I create a muted, flat-color landscape look in Lightroom?
How can I recreate this hard, direct flash look for blog portraits?
How can I create soft, backlit portraits with warm skin tones in Lightroom or Photoshop?
How can I reduce harsh facial contrast in post-processing?
How can I edit a photo to look vibrant, lush, and soft in Lightroom?