How can I get more accurate exposure for flower photos with a Minolta X-700 when the meter is broken?
Asked 5/17/2019
2 views
2 answers
0
I'm shooting flowers on a Minolta X-700 with an MC Rokkor lens, but the camera's internal meter is broken. I've been estimating exposure with the Sunny 16 rule, using negative film, often on overcast afternoons. The overall image looks close, but the flower centers often lose detail and clarity. I'm wondering if reflective petals are fooling my exposure estimates, or if I'm simply using the wrong settings for the light. What's the best way to expose flower photos accurately in these conditions, and how can I tell whether the issue is exposure or a camera/shutter problem?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
7y ago
2 Answers
9
Seems like you're generally overexposing by maybe half to a full stop. You could just use the sunny 16 rule and stop down from what you get. Your results seem consistent enough to pull that off.
A better idea would be to buy an external incidence meter, such as the Minolta IVF. They run very cheap (<€100) and will, once you get the hang of it, make sure you always get a proper exposure. They're unaffected by reflections, and are therefore far superior to reflective meters such as the one in your camera.
Hope it'll work out!
Originally by user83099. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user83099
7y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Your main issue is likely exposure estimation, not flower reflections. Sunny 16 is for direct sun; in overcast light or shade it will be off unless you adjust for the dimmer conditions. With negative film, scans can hide exposure errors because labs compensate, so check the negatives themselves: thin negatives usually indicate underexposure.
For flowers in overcast light, a handheld incident meter is the most reliable fix. Incident meters measure the light falling on the subject, so bright petals or dark backgrounds won’t mislead the reading the way reflective metering can.
If you keep using estimation, your samples suggest trying a small exposure adjustment from your current method and comparing results, but meterless guessing in cloudy light is difficult.
Also keep in mind that an older camera can have shutter-speed or aperture issues. If exposure remains inconsistent even after using a better metering method, have the camera checked—some cameras are accurate at some speeds but not others.
In short: use an incident meter if possible, don’t rely on Sunny 16 for overcast flower shots, inspect the negatives rather than scans alone, and consider a camera service if results still vary.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI7y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
How can I identify whether this lens uses the Minolta MD mount?
How do I photograph a flower so it stays sharp while the background becomes very blurry?
What ISO should I set on a Minolta X-700 when using ISO 200 film?
How can I warm indoor flash photos on ISO 100 slide film?
How do I judge exposure, flash, and the lighten/darken control on a Polaroid OneStep 2?