For dog portraits on a Canon 77D, should I choose a 35mm or 50mm prime?
Asked 9/23/2018
3 views
2 answers
0
I use a Canon EOS 77D (APS-C) and already have a 70-200mm f/4. I want to add a prime lens mainly for dogs, portraits, and some close-up dog photos. I’m considering a 35mm f/1.8 or a 50mm f/1.4, and I care most about sharpness and bokeh. On an APS-C body, which focal length is likely to suit this kind of shooting better?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
7y ago
2 Answers
8
Since the choice of lens is highly subjective, we can’t tell you definitively which to pick. Instead, I’ll offer a suggestion about how to make the decision yourself.
Each lens has many variables that can be evaluated only with the specific lens: sharpness, bokeh, speed, physical dimension, weight, etc. But one thing you can test quite generically is framing.
A 50mm lens will give you tighter framing than a 35mm lens.
Before moving to (crop-sensor) digital, my go-to lens was a nifty-fifty on a film camera. On the digital camera, it felt very uncomfortable. 35mm felt a lot better. After learning about the difference between crop sensor and full frame, this made a lot more sense.
Dig out your old kit lens or get a cheap 18-55mm kit lens second hand. Then zoom it to 35mm and look through the viewfinder, maybe even take a few snaps. Then repeat with 50mm. This would give you a sense of which you prefer.
After that, treat the zoom as just a zoom and do a just-for-fun photo shoot. Then collect your photos and see what focal length your favourite shots were set at.
This should give you a good idea of which lens to go for.
Note on sharpness and bokeh: lens reviews on the internet cover these extensively. In picking the 2 lens options, your research should have already covered both aspects.
If you still find it hard to decide, I suggest going for the 35mm lens. Your existing 70-200mm shouldn’t be too far off the 50mm prime, so the 35mm prime will give you a more ‘different’ feel to the zoom lens.
Originally by user69434. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user69434
7y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
The more important choice here is focal length, not just lens sharpness. On APS-C, 50mm gives a noticeably tighter view than 35mm, and many people find 35mm more natural for general use while 50mm can feel tighter.
For portraits, though, 35mm can be on the short side because it may exaggerate facial features if you shoot close, while 50mm is generally more flattering. That makes 50mm the safer choice if your priority is dog portraits and subject separation.
That said, this is still personal: bokeh rendering and handling are subjective, and sharpness alone is often overemphasized. The best way to decide is to test the framing yourself with a zoom lens: set it to 35mm, then 50mm, and see which working distance and perspective you prefer for dogs and portraits.
If your use is mostly portraits, lean 50mm. If you want a more general everyday prime and wider framing indoors, lean 35mm. For especially flattering dog headshots, longer focal lengths can work even better.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI7y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Canon APS-C starter prime: EF 35mm f/2 IS or EF 50mm f/1.4?
How do the Canon EF 28mm f/1.8 and Sigma 30mm f/1.4 compare with the Canon 50mm f/1.8 on APS-C?
Best Canon lens for portraits and occasional wedding/party shooting on an EOS 600D?
Is a Sigma 35mm f/1.4 a worthwhile upgrade from a Canon 50mm f/1.8 on APS-C?
Canon APS-C walk-around prime: EF 40mm f/2.8 or EF 50mm f/1.4?