Does a front-mounted close-up lens change bellows factor?
Asked 7/31/2023
3 views
2 answers
0
I understand bellows factor as exposure compensation caused by extending the lens farther from the film/sensor, especially at close focus. What happens if I add a front-mounted close-up lens such as a Nikon 4T (+/− diopter close-up attachment) to an existing lens on bellows? Can I treat the close-up lens as changing the focal length and use that new focal length in the bellows-factor formula, or is that the wrong way to think about it?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
2y ago
2 Answers
1
Bellows Factor: As you know, modern cameras are adjustable and allow focusing over a wide range of subject distance. However, many camera models prevent extreme close focusing. We are talking about subject distances closer than 5 focal lengths. At distances greater than 5 focal lengths, the exposure error induced by bellows factor is trivial thus ignored.
As we close focus, the f-numbers engraved on the lens barrel become gradually invalid. At magnification 1 (unity – life size) the subject distance is twice the focal length and the error induced in the f-numbers, as denoted. This error is 2 f-stops, which is a factor of 4. We use the factor value as a multiplier. As an example, if the normal shutter speed is 1/100 of a second, at magnification 1 the exposure factor is 4 thus to compensate, we multiply 1/100 X 4 = 4/100 = 1/25 of a second.
One solution is to mount a close-up lens. This is a simple magnifier lens akin to the lenses used in reading eye glasses. Normally we classify lenses by expressing their power in terms of focal length in the millimeter scale.
Opticians often switch to a unit of measure called the diopter. A lens with a focal length of 1000mm is classified as 1 diopter written as 1d. A 500mm lens converts to 2d and a 250mm lens is 4d. The conversion formula is 1/focal length in millimeters times 1000. Thus, a 50mm lens converted to diopter is 1/50 X 1000 =20d. Opticians do this to simplify the math used when combining lens elements.
When a camera’s design does not permit extreme close-up imaging, we can resort to several remedies. The simplest is to mount a close-up supplementary lens. The close-up lens, when doing close up work, forces the light rays to enter the camera lens as nearly parallel rays. This allows close imaging while eliminating any need to adjust the exposure (no bellows factor compensation required).
If we seek different remedies such as extension tuber bellows attachments, we now must recognize that an exposure error has been induced. The formula is bellows factor = magnification + 1 squared.
Suppose we work at magnification 1 (life-size). Magnification =1 = 1 + 1 squared = 4. This is the bellows factor for unity. We compensate for this elevated magnification by multiplying the unadjusted shutter speed by multiplying it by 4.
With a +2.9 supplementary close-up lens mounted, set the camera for infinity focus, place the object to be imaged 1/2.9 X 1000 = 345mm forward of the first lens of the camera barrel.
Originally by user44949. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user44949
2y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
A front-mounted close-up lens does not itself create extra bellows factor. Bellows factor comes from lens extension: moving the lens farther from the image plane reduces image-plane illumination, especially at high magnification.
A close-up/diopter attachment changes the focusing behavior at the front of the system, not the bellows extension mechanism that causes the exposure loss. In practical terms, you should not treat the attachment as a new single focal length and plug that into the bellows-factor formula.
Use bellows factor based on the actual image magnification or extension of the main lens/bellows setup. The close-up lens mainly lets you focus closer (or changes the working distance/focus range) without, by itself, requiring additional exposure compensation the way added extension does.
So: the issue is not that you are “holding it wrong”; it’s that converting the diopter attachment into an equivalent focal length and using that alone for bellows calculations is the wrong model.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI2y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Can a 100mm bellows lens achieve 1:1 slide duplication on a Minolta Auto Bellows I?
Does unit focusing change depth of field compared with internal/element focusing?
Should crop factor be used when calculating camera field of view?
What focal length on a 1.6× crop DSLR matches a 1365mm-equivalent superzoom?
Which lens is better for a close-up filter: Canon 50mm f/1.8 or Tamron 18-270mm?