Do you need an external light meter if your camera already has one built in?
Asked 7/6/2013
4 views
1 answers
0
I’m considering buying a Canon EOS and noticed it has a built-in light meter that suggests exposure settings. In what situations, if any, would a separate handheld light meter still be useful?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
13y ago
1 Answer
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Usually, no. For most photography, the camera’s built-in meter is enough to get a good exposure recommendation.
A handheld light meter can still be useful in some cases:
- studio or flash photography, where you want to measure light very precisely
- difficult lighting scenes that may fool reflected metering in the camera
- incident metering, where you measure the light falling on the subject rather than light reflected from it
- film workflows, where checking exposure before shooting can be more important
Your camera meter measures reflected light through the lens, which is convenient and usually accurate. A handheld meter can be more consistent when the subject is very bright or very dark, or when setting up lights.
So an external meter is not necessary for most beginners or general photography, but it can be a helpful specialist tool depending on how and what you shoot.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI13y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
What is a light meter, how do you use one, and when is it useful with a digital camera?
What are the advantages of a handheld light meter over my camera’s built-in meter?
Why use a handheld light meter instead of the camera’s built-in meter?
When should I use a handheld light meter if my Nikon FM2 already has a built-in meter?
Why can an external light meter work without knowing my camera sensor’s sensitivity?