Do I need a VR kit lens with the Nikon D3400, or should I buy body-only and choose a different lens?
Asked 9/22/2017
3 views
2 answers
0
I’m considering a Nikon D3400. A salesperson told me the 18-55mm kit lens available here does not include Vibration Reduction (VR), and that VR is less important on the D3400 because the camera’s processor compensates for it. I currently have a D3000 kit lens with VR.
Is that advice sound? Would it make more sense to buy the D3400 body only and put the money toward a better lens instead? I’m an amateur and often photograph people moving quickly toward or away from me.
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
8y ago
2 Answers
2
In Australia where your profile indicates you are located, Nikon only offers the D3400 in kits with an 18-55mm lens with the AF-P DX NIKKOR 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G (non-VR version). What the salesman is telling you seems to be true, at least with regard to the lens, in Australia. The bit about VR no longer being needed "because the processor takes care of much of this function..." may be a bit more of a stretch. If Nikon has modified the way their camera bodies, particularly the D3400, process images to reduce blur they sure haven't touted it in any of their promotional materials.
If, however, one were located in the U.S. your question would have an entirely different answer.
The kit lens included with the Nikon D3400 in the US is the AF-P DX NIKKOR 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR. The 'VR' at the end of the lens' name stands for 'Vibration Reduction'.
The non-VR version of the AF-P 18-55mm is not listed in any official D3400 kits at the Nikon U.S. website. The non-VR versions of the Nikon AF-P lenses are marketed by Nikon in the U.S. to be used with older bodies not capable of turning VR on/off via a menu selection since the AF-P VR lenses do not have an on/off switch of VR on the lens¹. The D3400, at least the version of the D3400 sold in the U.S., has the ability to control the VR on AF-P lenses via a menu item.
If you were in the U.S. and a salesman is trying to sell you an 18-55mm lens with a D3400 that is not a VR lens he is either:
- Ignorant of what he is selling
OR
- Trying to sell you an old (pre-2007) lens or a cheaper non-kit non-VR version of the AF-P 18-55mm with a new camera body, probably for the suggested price of the newer/higher priced lens.
In which case run, don't walk, to the nearest exit of whatever store this salesman works.
¹ Please see Thom Hogan's comments in this revue regarding VR vs. non-VR versions of AF-P lenses.
Originally by user15871. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user15871
8y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
VR is a lens feature, not something the D3400’s processor can truly replace. There’s no solid reason to assume the camera body makes VR unnecessary.
That said, VR mainly helps reduce blur from camera shake at slower shutter speeds. It does not freeze subject motion. Since you often photograph people running toward or away from you, shutter speed is usually more important than VR for getting sharp shots.
So the salesperson is only partly right: lack of VR may not be crucial for your use, but not because the processor is doing the same job. It’s because action shots usually need fast shutter speeds anyway.
If the local D3400 kit only comes with the non-VR 18-55mm, that can still be fine for general use and learning. If you’re deciding between the kit and body-only, the better reason to choose a different lens would be autofocus speed, focal length, or low-light performance—not the idea that the body replaces VR.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI8y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Should a first-time DSLR buyer get the kit lens or buy the body and lens separately?
Nikon D3100 starter lens: 18-55mm kit, 18-105mm kit, or skip the kit lens?
Is a buzzing or humming sound from Nikon lens VR normal?
What’s the difference between Nikon’s 18-55mm kit lens options for the D3100?
Should I buy the Nikon D7000 kit with the 18-105mm, or put that money toward a different lens?