Do I need a model or property release for doorstep photography in the UK?
Asked 9/21/2020
3 views
2 answers
0
I want to do doorstep portraits in the UK and keep the copyright as the photographer. Do I need any kind of release form, and can permission be revoked later? I'm mainly trying to understand the difference between owning the photo and having permission to use images of identifiable people or homes, especially for commercial or professional use.
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
5y ago
2 Answers
3
You always own the rights to any photograph you take. That is clear & without doubt.
The issue comes down to whether you have clear right to use an image of a person or building for commercial purposes.
You're going to have to ask permission, and if you want to use the photographs anywhere professionally/commercially, you're going to need written proof that you asked. A signed release cannot be revoked under ordinary circumstances.
If someone refuses to give consent, then you are on shaky ground as to whether you even had the right to take the photograph in the first place.
Photographing unidentifiable people in public, you can often get away without a release - until you want to sell through one of the stock photo libraries online… then they'll not take your work without one. The law may say one thing, but the online stock photo organisations want their potential legal liability covered in all circumstances.
People on their own doorsteps provide two issues - you need a model release for each person in the photo, as they will be clearly identifiable, & you will also need a release for the building they're standing in front of, for similar reasons of identification & also that you are not on public property.
You can claim to be a photo-journalist if you're not standing on their property, but that won't get you far if you want to publish commercially.
So… get release forms signed.
Some resources -
Format - The Ultimate Guide To Photo Release Forms [international, general guidance only]
Royal Photographic Society - specific UK-law model release
For any further details, consult a lawyer.
Originally by user57929. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user57929
5y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
In the UK, if you legally take the photo, you normally own the copyright automatically as the photographer. You do not need a form to “retain the rights” to your own photos.
The separate issue is permission to use identifiable people or property, especially for commercial uses such as advertising or stock licensing. For that, a signed model release or property release is commonly needed as proof of consent. A properly signed release is generally not something that can simply be revoked at will.
If the photo is taken in a context that raises privacy, trespass, or personal-data concerns, the situation becomes more sensitive. Images that include extra personally identifiable information may create additional legal issues.
So:
- copyright ownership: automatically yours if the photo is lawfully taken
- commercial/professional use of identifiable subjects: get a written release
- no release may be needed for some editorial or non-commercial uses, but many stock libraries still require one
If you plan to sell, license, or use doorstep portraits commercially, the practical answer is to get a signed release from the subject (and possibly property owner where relevant).
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI5y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Do you need a model release in the UK for identifiable people in commercial website photos?
Does a missing property release mean I lose copyright in my photo?
Can I sell photos of railroad tracks, plants, or animals photographed on public property in the U.S.?
Can a UK university require permission for non-commercial photography on campus?
Do photographers need a license or permission to photograph people or places in the U.S.?