Do I need a circular polarizer on a Canon SX30 IS, or will a linear polarizer work the same?

Asked 3/5/2011

48 views

2 answers

0

I'm using a Canon SX30 IS point-and-shoot for travel and landscape photography, including volcano and wildlife shots. I've previously used a circular polarizer on another camera, but I've read that this camera can use a linear polarizer instead. Is that correct? If so, will a linear polarizer give the same visible effect when rotated, and why do some cameras require circular polarizers while others do not?

Originally by user4175. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user4175

15y ago

2 Answers

11

You have an understandable misconception which is clouding the issue for you. The "circular" in "circular polarization" doesn't refer to the way the light is polarized in a different plane as you rotate the filter. It refers to the way the waves of light themselves are aligned. Check out this (public domain) illustration from Wikipedia:

illustration of circular polarization

Trippy, huh? But really, this part doesn't matter. The problem is that linearly polarized light might interfere with metering in an SLR camera. That's because the half-mirror used to direct light to an SLRs' metering and autofocus system also has a polarizing effect. The concern is that certain alignments of incoming linearly-polarized light might get canceled out, affecting the metering and focus. Using circularly-polarized light bypasses this.

But, really, it's not this wacky radial polarization that's useful. It's the linear effect that's really desired — that's what keeps out light that's aligned inconveniently in your scene. So, why does a circular polarizer work anyway? Another picture (again, public domain from Wikipedia) makes this clear:

Construction of a circular polarizer

You can see that the "normal" light coming in from the right side is first restricted to being linearly polarized, and only after transformed into the convenient-for-metering circularly-polarized light.

That was long, so here's the summary answer in bold: In either a simple linear polarizer or a more expensive and complicated circular one, it's rotating the orientation of this linear polarization that gives the important effect.

Your point & shoot camera doesn't use a half-transparent mirror to direct light to a dedicated set of metering and autofocus sensors, so there's no need to do an additional transformation to prevent interference. So you can just go ahead with the linear polarizer and it will work the same way.

(All of this said, I've seen pretty good anecdotal evidence that linear polarizers don't significantly interfere with metering or focus in most SLRs either. Presumably the polarization effect of the half-mirror isn't as strong as assumed by the circular-is-necessary theory.)

Originally by user1943. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user1943

15y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Yes — on a point-and-shoot like the Canon SX30 IS, a linear polarizer should give the same photographic polarizing effect as a circular polarizer when you rotate it.

The important difference is not the visible effect in the image. Both types reduce reflections, darken skies, and increase saturation in the same way because the actual polarizing element is doing the same job.

A circular polarizer is basically a linear polarizer plus an extra layer that changes the light after it passes through. That extra step is mainly needed for cameras that use phase-detect autofocus or certain SLR-style metering systems, because linearly polarized light can interfere with those systems.

Most point-and-shoot cameras use contrast-detect autofocus, which is not affected in the same way by polarization. So they generally do not require a circular polarizer.

In short: for your SX30 IS, a linear polarizer should work just as well for image results. Rotate it the same way you would a circular polarizer to control the strength of the effect.

UniqueBot

AI

15y ago

Your Answer