Do I need a 10-stop ND filter for 1–4 hour film exposures at night?

Asked 11/16/2017

2 views

2 answers

0

I want to make very long film exposures at night, around 1 to 4 hours, in very dark scenes with some street lights. Do I actually need a 10-stop ND filter for that, or can I decide based on the metered exposure? How do I work out whether an ND filter is needed in different situations?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

8y ago

2 Answers

1

Filter Factors to the rescue: By tradition (and some science) the basic unit of exposure change is the f-stop.

This is a 2X incremental chance in image brilliance. In other words, each f-stop change is a doubling or halving of the light energy that comprise the exposure.

This being true, we can state that if a filter that attenuates 1 f-stop of light it can be described as having a Filter Factor of 2. If a filter attenuates 2 f-stops of light, its Filter Factor is 4.

Another way to compute a Filter Factor, if the number of stops of attenuation is known, we elevate the number 2 using the number of stops of attenuation as an exponent. Using this method a table of Filter Factors can be conducted.

1 f-stop = 2^1 = 2

2 f-stops = 2^2 =4

3 f-stops = 2^3 = 8

4 f-stops = 2^4 = 16

5 f-stops = 2^5 = 32

6 f-stops = 2^6 = 64

7 f-stops = 2^7 = 128

8 f-stops = 2^8 = 256

9 f-stops = 2^9 = 512

10 f-stops = 2^10 = 1024

Now the FF (Filter Factor) can be used as a multiply factor that computes a revised shutter speed.

Suppose your unfiltered exposure is f/8 @ 1 second. You desire an exposure time of 64 seconds. You mount a 6 stop ND and the revised exposure time is the unfiltered time multiplied by the FF. Thus 1 X 64 = 64 seconds.

Another example: Unfiltered exposure time is 1/100 of a second (written in decimal form as 0.01 seconds. You mount a 10 stop ND. The revised exposure time is 0.01 X 1024 = 10.24 seconds.

Reciprocity failure is a photo film phenomenon. We must add time if the exposure is prolonged. Digital sensors have their problems but not this one.

Originally by user44949. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user44949

8y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Not necessarily. For 1–4 hour night exposures, whether you need an ND filter depends on your metered base exposure, not the target time alone.

Start by metering the scene without the filter. Then count stops from your metered shutter speed to your desired exposure time. Each stop doubles the exposure time, and each ND stop doubles it again.

Example from the answers: if the correct exposure is ISO 400, f/5.6, 4 seconds, changing to ISO 100 and f/11 adds 4 stops, taking you to about 64 seconds. To reach about 1 hour from there, you’d need roughly 6 more stops of light reduction, so about a 6-stop ND.

A 10-stop ND is only needed if your unfiltered exposure is still far too short after using the slowest practical film speed and the aperture you want.

Also, with film, reciprocity failure is critical: long exposures often need much more time than simple stop calculations suggest, and the amount varies by film stock. That means you may need less ND than the math first indicates, or a different corrected exposure entirely.

So: meter first, calculate stops, then apply your film’s reciprocity data.

UniqueBot

AI

8y ago

Your Answer