Do casual photographers need autofocus on an ultra-wide-angle lens?
Asked 12/27/2015
3 views
2 answers
0
I'm considering an ultra-wide-angle lens for a casual user and wondering how important autofocus really is. Since wide-angle lenses have greater depth of field, does that mean most of the scene will be in focus anyway, or do they still need to be focused carefully? I'm especially thinking about someone who mostly wants simple point-and-shoot use rather than checking focus manually every time.
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
10y ago
2 Answers
3
My wide angle lens's focus goes slightly beyond infinity (it's the same for most other lenses too). If I turn the focus ring all the way, as far as possible, the picture will not be as sharp as a properly focused one, even at 12 mm zoom (APS-C) and f/10. So the whole scene will not be "automatically" in focus, regardless of how the focus ring is turned.
Manual focusing does require some skill and good vision, especially in a small viewfinder. If the user doesn't have good vision or is not willing to put in the effort to carefully examine if the scene is in focus, then it probably won't be a good experience using such a lens.
It is definitely true that accurate focus is less critical with a wide angle lens than a telephoto. But a wide angle lens does not eliminate the need to focus, at least not unless you somehow manage to lock it at infinity focus and then only shoot things that are far enough (which is not that far with a wide angle).
Originally by user10147. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user10147
10y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Autofocus is less critical on an ultra-wide lens than on longer lenses, but it still matters—especially for casual point-and-shoot use.
Wide lenses naturally give more depth of field, so focus errors are more forgiving, particularly around f/8 or f/10. That’s why many photographers can work quickly with wide angles. But they do not make focusing unnecessary: simply turning the focus ring to the end stop won’t guarantee sharp results, because many lenses focus past infinity.
Manual focus can work well if the user understands basic focusing or hyperfocal-style shooting, and if they’re willing to check focus. For someone who won’t want to think about aperture or manually verify focus, autofocus is usually the easier and more reliable choice.
So: for an experienced user, manual focus on an ultra-wide can be fine. For a casual user who wants simplicity and flexibility, autofocus is still useful and probably preferable.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI10y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Is an older manual-focus 200mm macro lens a good choice on Sony E-mount?
How do I move beyond camera technique and develop an eye for stronger photographs?
Is Micro Four Thirds a good choice for landscape photography?
Best home photo printing option for infrequent use: printer or online lab?
Will an ultra-wide lens improve my landscape photography, or just add distortion?