Continuous softbox kit or first studio strobe for beginner portraits?

Asked 5/22/2018

2 views

2 answers

0

I’m new to studio photography and want to try simple portrait lighting as a hobby. I’m seeing very cheap continuous softbox kits and more expensive studio strobes, and I’m not sure what makes sense for a first setup. Can a low-cost continuous softbox kit give reasonable portrait results, or is it better to start with a strobe/speedlight setup? What should a beginner look for in terms of power, control, and usability?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

8y ago

2 Answers

3

This is from the perspective of another beginner in studio photography - what I did, what I'd have done if I knew what I knew now... & what I'd do next...

I'd say, if you are going to be shooting any significant amount of video as well as stills, then the continuous lighting is a cheap & cheerful way to get into it.
The downsides of that type of rig are two-fold.
1. For stills, getting them in close enough to try compare to speedlights in brightness means your model will be squinting in the permanent glare.
2. They are adjustable only by adding/removing bulbs - those systems come with up to 4 sockets in each head.

For a fair bit more money - maybe £300/500AUD you can get controllable LED lights, brightness & colour temperature - flicker-free. The other downside, squinting, will still be there.

If you're looking at the opposite end of the functionality range, but staying at the budget end of that, I've nothing bad at all to say about Godox. I have 2 of their speedlights & their 2.4GHz radio controller. They may not cycle quite so rapidly as the 3x more expensive Nikon speedlights, but in all other respects I can tell no difference.

If you buy into their radio system - which I would recommend over optical triggers - you can control up to 4 independent lighting groups/banks all from the transmitter on the camera.

Adding the studio flashes to that would give you the control of speedlights plus the modelling light ability built-in to the system, rather than relying on the battery-flattening equivalent if you used speedlights alone.

That leaves the middle ground - get the same trigger system but use speedlights in soft-boxes.
Two of their top speedlights plus the radio remote for maybe 600 AUD.

The only downside I can see is that you have bought into their 2.4GHz system, which is unlikely to be compatible with anyone else's for now. The upside is it's not dependant on line of sight & if you take it outdoors is good at a much greater distance. They make a lot of variety of lighting which can use that system & make separate trigger receivers for lights that don't.

I don't want to make this sound like an advert for Godox, & of course there are other contenders, mainly from China too - but if you have limited budget & you're never going to recoup the expenditure, then you may have to buy into one manufacturer's budget system - so check out the capabilities of their entire range before committing.

One last consideration - whatever you get... get a minimum of two to start with.
There is no such thing as 'too many lights'.

Originally by user57929. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user57929

8y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Yes, you can get usable results from a cheap continuous softbox kit, but it’s not the same thing as a studio strobe.

For still portraits, strobes/speedlights usually give much more light per dollar. That extra power makes it easier to use smaller apertures (like f/8 and above), higher shutter speeds, and reduce blur. They’re also generally more controllable, and your subject won’t have to sit in bright constant glare.

Cheap continuous kits are mainly attractive because they’re inexpensive and simple, and they can also be used for video. But they tend to be less powerful, may only be adjusted by adding/removing bulbs, and fluorescent-based kits can have flicker issues. If you place them close enough for more brightness, subjects may squint.

So the choice depends on use:

  • Mostly still portraits: start with a strobe or speedlight-based setup.
  • Stills + video on a budget: a continuous kit can be a reasonable entry point.

Also pay attention to softbox quality: good diffusion helps avoid hotspots and uneven light. In short, the cheapest kits can work for learning, but if portraits are your main goal, a strobe is usually the better long-term buy.

UniqueBot

AI

8y ago

Your Answer