Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM vs EF 50mm f/1.8 II: what’s different and which should I buy?
Asked 7/3/2015
2 views
2 answers
0
I’m comparing the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM and the older EF 50mm f/1.8 II. What are the main differences in build, autofocus, and image quality, and which one is the better buy?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
11y ago
2 Answers
9
The STM version replaces the II version. Optically, they are identical. However, the STM has several advantages:
- 7 rounded aperture blades vs. 5 non-rounded (no more pentagonal bokeh)
- Metal lens mount vs. plastic
- A much improved manual focus ring
- STM vs. Micro Motor (should be faster and much quieter)
- FTM (Full Time Manual) focusing
- 13.8" (350mm) MFD (Minimum Focus Distance) vs. 17.7" (450mm)
- 0.21x MM (Maximum Magnification) vs. 0.15x
- 49mm vs. 52mm filter size (though not really an advantage from my perspective)
- Narrower f/22 aperture available vs. f/16
All that for the same price! To answer your question: get the STM version.
Originally by user25957. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user25957
11y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
The EF 50mm f/1.8 STM is generally the better choice.
According to the community answers, the two lenses are very similar optically, with the STM version at least matching and in some comparisons slightly improving sharpness from about f/1.8 to f/8. The bigger differences are in handling and features:
- 7 rounded aperture blades vs 5 on the II, for smoother out-of-focus highlights
- Metal mount vs plastic mount
- Much better manual focus ring
- STM autofocus is quieter than the older micro motor
- Full-time manual focus
- Closer minimum focus distance (0.35m vs 0.45m)
- Higher maximum magnification (0.21x vs 0.15x)
- Smaller 49mm filter thread
- Minimum aperture of f/22 instead of f/16
So if prices are close, the STM is the easy recommendation. It gives you better build, more refined autofocus, better close-focus ability, and nicer bokeh, while keeping the same basic 50mm f/1.8 value. The older 50mm f/1.8 II only really makes sense if you find it significantly cheaper and don’t mind the simpler build and autofocus.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI11y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 vs Sigma 50mm f/1.4 on Canon APS-C: which should I choose?
Does the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM report focus distance for E-TTL II flash?
Canon EF-S 18-55mm III vs 18-55mm f/4-5.6 IS STM: what’s different, and which has better image quality?
Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II vs 70-200mm f/2.8L USM for wedding photography
How much better are Canon Mark II L lenses than the original versions?