Canon EF 24-70mm f/4L IS vs EF 24-105mm f/4L IS for general use and occasional weddings
Asked 5/20/2013
1 views
2 answers
0
I’m choosing a standard Canon zoom for general photography and occasional weddings, and I’m deciding between the EF 24-70mm f/4L IS and the EF 24-105mm f/4L IS. I already know the basic specs, but I’m trying to understand the real-world tradeoffs in image quality and value. Some reviews suggest the 24-105mm may be a bit sharper, while others point to advantages for the 24-70mm. Is the 24-70mm f/4L worth paying more for, or is the 24-105mm f/4L the better buy for this kind of use?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
13y ago
2 Answers
9
If you are doing weddings, the extra stop of an f/2.8 lens is almost essential when shooting in churches that don't allow the use of flash. For about the same price as the EF 24-70mm f/4, you can buy a Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC. The reviews I have seen place it between the original EF 24-70mm f/2.8L and the EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II in terms of sharpness. The Tamron, unlike both of the Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 versions, also has Vibration Compensation (VC) which is equivalent to Image Stabilization (IS) in Canon nomenclature.
The only real advantage of the EF 24-70mm f/4L IS over the EF 24-105mm f/4L IS is the much shorter minimum focal distance that is useful for close photography of smaller objects. It is not a true macro lens, but with a maximum magnification of 0.70X, it is a lot closer than the other 24-70mm lenses and the 24-105mm.
Compared to the EF 24-105mm f/4L IS in terms of sharpness the EF 24-70mm f/4L IS is sharper at 24mm (most notably on the edges), less sharp at 50mm, and only slightly less sharp at 70mm when the aperture is set at f/4 on both lenses.
If you will use it more for the wide angle end, get the EF 24-70mm f/4L IS. If you will use it more on the longer end get the EF 24-105mm f/4L IS. If you are serious about doing weddings, get one of the 24-70mm f/2.8 lenses.
Originally by user15871. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user15871
13y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Both are capable lenses, and neither is a bad choice. Based on the answers, the main practical differences are:
- 24-105mm f/4L IS: better range for general-purpose shooting and travel, and often the better value.
- 24-70mm f/4L IS: strongest advantage is its much closer focusing / higher magnification, which is useful for detail shots and close-ups.
On sharpness, the community responses don’t show a clear consensus that the 24-70mm f/4 is meaningfully better overall; if anything, some users felt the 24-105mm was at least competitive. So if your priority is versatility and cost, the 24-105mm f/4L IS is the safer choice.
For weddings, several answers suggest that f/4 may be limiting in dim venues, especially where flash isn’t allowed. In that case, a 24-70mm f/2.8 is often the more suitable wedding lens than either f/4 option.
So: choose the 24-105mm f/4L IS for range and value, the 24-70mm f/4L IS if you specifically want the close-focus capability, and consider a 24-70mm f/2.8 if weddings are a serious part of your shooting.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI13y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Is Canon’s 24-105mm f/4L a real image-quality upgrade over the 18-135mm on a 40D?
Best first lens upgrade for a Canon 250D from the 18-55mm kit lens?
Which Canon lens is best for fashion photography if I care most about sharpness?
Is the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L worth the extra cost over the Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8?
Canon EF-S 15-85mm vs EF 24-105mm f/4L as an all-around upgrade on APS-C