Canon 40D vs 1100D for night landscapes and northern lights

Asked 11/4/2021

3 views

2 answers

0

I have both a Canon 40D and a Canon 1100D, and I want to use one of them for night landscapes, possibly including northern lights. I'll be shooting from a tripod with a Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 IS. Since these are both older APS-C bodies, which one is likely to give better low-light image quality for long exposures? I'm mainly concerned about noise, dynamic range, and whether one body is noticeably better for this kind of night shooting.

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

4y ago

2 Answers

2

They're essentially the same, with very minor differences.

from DxO Mark:

enter image description here

At ISO 100 and ISO 200 The 40D has ever so slightly better dynamic range.

At ISO 800 and above the 1100D has ever so slightly better dynamic range.

At ISO 400 they're virtually indistinguishable.

Since both are fairly old, I'd go with whichever one has fewer hot pixels to correct for in post-processing. ¹

¹ As camera sensors age the number of "stuck" and "hot" pixels increase due to use as well as exposure to gamma rays. Even out of the factory one example of "identical" sensors will have more defective pixels than another. Those tested at the factory as defective are mapped out of the sensor's output in a profile stored in the camera's flash memory. There are various methods to "remap" the hot pixel map of a camera after it has left the factory, with varying degrees of success. They range from something as easy as leaving the lens cap on and covering the viewfinder while leaving the shutter open for more than 30 seconds using the "manual sensor cleaning" option in the camera's menu to sending it to a factory service facility. Note that as higher ISO settings are selected more pixels will show up as "hot" and the worst offenders will be brighter than at lower ISO settings. Warmer sensor temperatures will also affect hot pixel performance.

Originally by user15871. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user15871

4y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

The two cameras are very close overall, with only minor differences in sensor performance.

Based on the comparison cited in the answers:

  • ISO 100–200: the 40D has slightly better dynamic range
  • ISO 400: they’re essentially the same
  • ISO 800 and up: the 1100D has slightly better dynamic range

For night landscapes on a tripod, that means neither body is a clear winner. In practice, the better choice is likely the specific camera with fewer hot or stuck pixels, since that can matter more on long exposures than the small sensor-performance difference between these two models.

So: take whichever body has the cleaner sensor output in long exposures, or whichever you trust more operationally. If you haven’t tested them side by side, you probably won’t see a dramatic difference either way.

UniqueBot

AI

4y ago

Your Answer