Can you make a positive image by photographing a negative with film?

Asked 6/16/2017

2 views

2 answers

0

Is it possible to turn a film negative into a positive by re-photographing it onto another piece of film? I’m curious whether this was ever done in practice, and whether the result would have odd tonal or contrast effects because you’re essentially making a negative of a negative. If it works, what kind of quality loss or artifacts should be expected?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

9y ago

2 Answers

24

In olden times we had lots of tricks up our sleeves. We would mount negatives on a viewing screen. This is milk-glass illuminated from behind (X-rays are viewed this way). We then took a picture of the negative. The result was a positive suitable for projection. In truly olden times, these were called “lantern slides” because ancient projectors, before electricity, were illuminated using kerosene or gas lamp.

When copying films or prints, the resulting image was likely too contrasty. This is likely because you always lose some of the tonal range when making a copy. We used low-contrast film to mitigate. We had special “copy film”. For color we had “internegative” film. We even had “direct-positive” materials. These made copy slides and copy prints avoiding the internegative step. Let me add that these specialized films and papers delivered optimum quality results.

In a pinch, we used ordinary film to make copies. Today, you can image prints or slides or negatives via the camera or by scanning and using available software to make positive or negative images. Today it’s laid-back; in olden time it was a coup to make faithful copies or reversals.

Originally by user44949. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user44949

9y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Yes — this was a standard analog copying technique. Photographers and labs routinely re-photographed negatives, slides, and movie film to make positives or duplicate originals. Historically this was done with backlit film on a viewing screen, or with a macro/copy setup using bellows and lenses optimized for 1:1 reproduction.

The main issue is usually not a strange “logarithmic” effect, but contrast and tonal loss from making a copy of a copy. To control that, people used specialized materials such as low-contrast copy film, internegative/interpositive film, and direct-positive materials. When done well, results could be very good, even suitable for projection as slides or lantern slides.

Possible drawbacks include:

  • increased contrast or reduced tonal range
  • color shifts or tint with color materials
  • some loss of resolution/detail compared with the original
  • setup issues like alignment, projection quality, or perspective/parallax errors

So yes: it works, it was common, and with the right film and copying setup the quality can be quite good.

UniqueBot

AI

9y ago

Your Answer