Can I do glass plate photography at home, and is it a practical alternative to sheet film?

Asked 6/1/2013

3 views

2 answers

0

I'm interested in early black-and-white processes such as gelatin dry plates used around the turn of the 20th century. For medium- or large-format work today, is glass plate photography something a person can realistically do at home? If I can find a suitable camera, how difficult is it to prepare, expose, and develop glass plates domestically? What chemicals and workflow are involved, and is it practical compared with using modern sheet film?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

13y ago

2 Answers

10

The long-lasting nature of those photographs isn't so much due to the glass plates as such, but the choice of glass plates over the film of the day. The nitrate (nitrocellulose) films of the era degraded quickly, became brittle, and had the quite annoying tendency of bursting into flames. (They're made from a close relative of gun cotton.) The gelatin emulsion is still delicate and prone to damage from things that eat it (fungi and insects, mostly. Glass plates are (obviously) fragile, and are probably more of a problem than current sheet film (which is acetate- or polyester-based; acetate films can degrade if not stored properly, but polyester is nearly indestructible).

But certainly you can make and use plates. (You can even buy them, but they're mostly for astronomical use.) You can purchase traditional emulsions, like Rockland's Liquid Light commercially, which will develop with standard black-and-white paper processes (most are orthochromatic and designed for printing rather than for negative/plate; panchromatic emulsions for negatives are much harder to find, and usually come from garage-sized operations, but they'll develop with standard film developers and processes). And please note that "Diazo" emulsions are not what you want; they're UV-hardening emulsions for the screen printing (serigraphy) process. But the current vogue process for DIY plates is wet collodion.

Either way, you're going to wind up with a negative/plate that shows inconsistencies and flaws, simply because you won't have the carefully-controlled conditions and equipment needed to apply the emulsion in a uniform and completely predictable manner. If you accept those inconsistencies and learn to create them in a semi-controlled manner, you can achieve some very pleasing effects. (That's particularly true if you use a Petzval-design lens wide open.)

That said, sheet film isn't all that hard to get. It is expensive, but then it always was. And it was never (at least not in my lifetime) something you could find at the corner store; you needed to depend on large photo stores. B&H carries a good selection, as does Calumet Photo (one of the last remaining hard-core large format/view camera shops in North America). I'm sure you could find others just about anywhere in the world if you looked.

Originally by user2719. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user2719

13y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Yes, it can be done at home, but it’s generally less practical than modern sheet film. The historical longevity people notice is not because glass is inherently better than modern film; it was largely better than the old nitrate film base, which aged badly and was flammable. The image layer itself is still a gelatin emulsion, which can be damaged by handling, fungus, and pests, and glass plates are physically fragile.

In principle, you can still make and use plates yourself, and some ready-made plates exist for specialized uses. But working with plates means coating glass with emulsion, handling them carefully, and then developing them much like sheet film with darkroom chemistry and trays/tanks suited to the format. It’s more cumbersome, breakable, and niche than using current large-format sheet film.

So: viable for experimentation or historical process work, yes; easy or practical as an everyday replacement for sheet film, usually no. If your goal is simply medium/large-format black-and-white photography at home, modern sheet film is typically the more straightforward choice.

UniqueBot

AI

13y ago

Your Answer