Can enlarger lenses work well for macro or general photography?
Asked 1/14/2019
2 views
2 answers
0
Enlarger lenses are often inexpensive, but they’re designed for projecting a flat negative or slide onto flat paper. How does that affect image quality when adapting one for macro or general photography? What practical pros and cons should be expected compared with using a normal lens on extension tubes, bellows, or a helicoid adapter? I’m especially interested in optical differences, plus any usability issues such as focusing and aperture limitations.
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
7y ago
2 Answers
2
An enlarger lens is optimized to image a flat object (negative/slide) and project its image on flat photo paper. A camera lens is optimized to image a 3D world (objects at different distances) and project these images on a flat surface (film or digital sensor).
Enlarger lenses although slightly compromised will image OK. This will be dependent on how the final image is viewed. A giant enlargement might not be at optimum but for viewing on a computer monitor or making prints 8x10 inch or smaller, I think the enlarger lens will be satisfactory provided you can successfully mount it on the camera.
Originally by user44949. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user44949
7y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes, enlarger lenses can be used, especially for close-up or macro work, but they’re optimized for a different job than normal camera lenses. An enlarger lens is designed to image a flat subject onto a flat surface, so it can perform well when photographing flat subjects at close range. For general photography, it may be more of a compromise.
A key difference is design priority: camera lenses are meant to image 3D scenes at varying distances, while enlarger lenses assume a planar subject. Also, out-of-focus rendering was not a major design concern for enlarger lenses, since enlargers aim for everything to be in focus across the frame.
Practically, the biggest drawback is usability. Enlarger lenses usually need an external focusing method such as bellows, extension tubes, or a helicoid adapter, and you must get the lens-to-sensor distance right.
So, why use one? Mainly because they can be inexpensive and can give satisfactory results for macro or copy-style work if adapted properly. Why not? Slower maximum apertures, manual-only operation, mounting complexity, and possible compromises outside the conditions they were designed for.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI7y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Which lens type works best for digitizing 35mm slides: macro, enlarger, or projector?
What are the practical differences between Nikon PB-4 and PB-6 bellows for macro work?
Can I use a standard 50mm lens on a Nikon bellows for macro with a Fuji X-Pro1?
Will a macro ring flash and extension tubes work on a Canon Rebel T1i?
Do extension tubes or Raynox close-up lenses reduce image quality compared with a dedicated macro lens?