Can digital photos contain invisible identifiers, and can you check or remove them?
Asked 12/24/2021
3 views
2 answers
0
Could a digital camera manufacturer embed an invisible watermark or identifier in image files so a photo can be traced back to a specific camera? If so, is there any practical way to detect or remove that kind of hidden identifier?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
4y ago
2 Answers
2
Every sensor is unique. That's why they are screened for hot/dead/stuck pixels at the factory and pixel mapping is done to each one before they're sent to the marketplace to be sold. With the millions of photosites on modern sensors, the probability that two sensors, even from the same batch, have the exact same mapping is pretty much statistically impossible. It's every bit as unique as a fingerprint.
If someone has the specific camera in question in their possession, they can fairly easily verify if a photo taken with that specific model camera came from that specific copy or not. No "watermark" needed. It's already there in the raw data off the sensor. That's assuming the image in question is reasonably exposed so that it's not completely blown out with every single pixel fully saturated, in which case the raw data contains no real usable information of any kind.
It's also possible to verify or eliminate if two disparate images came from the same camera or not. This is a bit more dependent upon the scene contents and exposure levels of each image, but it's still possible to compare two images and determine whether they were taken by the same specific camera or not with a fairly high degree of certainty.
Originally by user15871. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user15871
4y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes, hidden identifiers are possible in general, but camera makers typically don’t need to add a special invisible watermark. A digital camera sensor already has tiny, unique imperfections—such as pixel defects and pattern noise—that can act like a fingerprint. With access to the suspected camera, investigators can sometimes compare an image to that sensor pattern and determine whether it likely came from that exact unit.
There are also software-based invisible watermarking systems, but the community answers indicate camera manufacturers are not normally embedding these automatically in photos. Standard metadata like EXIF/IPTC can also identify a camera model or serial-related info, but that’s separate from an “invisible watermark.”
As for checking or removing hidden identifiers: metadata can be inspected and stripped fairly easily, but sensor-based fingerprints are inherent to the image data and are much harder to eliminate completely without significantly altering the image. In short, even without a deliberate watermark, a photo may still be traceable to a specific camera through the sensor’s unique signature.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI4y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Can Photoshop Elements 10 add an invisible watermark to PNG files without a subscription?
Can two photos be matched to the same camera without EXIF data?
Can I embed hidden copyright information in a photo to prove ownership?
Can Lightroom include a unique ID or version marker in exported filenames?
Can I photograph through beam-splitter glass without the subject seeing the camera lens?