Can Apple Photos create virtual copies or versions of the same photo?
Asked 4/25/2015
7 views
2 answers
0
In Apple Photos, is there a way to make multiple editable versions of one image—similar to Aperture versions or Lightroom virtual copies—without creating a full duplicate of the original file on disk?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
11y ago
2 Answers
4
Yes, you can do it several ways. With the image selected:
Pull down the Image menu, then say Duplicate 1 Photo.
⌘-D
Right-click or Ctrl-click the photo, then say "Duplicate 1 photo"
None of these methods make a copy of the original file on disk, a fact you can verify by subsequently saying File → Show Referenced File in Finder. No matter whether you do this to the original or the "duplicate", it always shows you the original file in the Finder window. In Lightroom parlance, it is making a "virtual copy" rather than a copy of the actual bits on disk.
That menu item only shows up when you have disabled the default preference to copy the photo into the Photos library on import. However, with that preference enabled, you can still see that the Masters sub-folder of the Photos library doesn't get a new file when you do this.
Duplicating a photo is, as you say, "cheap," but it is not free. I did some poking around inside the Photos library — which is just a specially-structured directory — and found that each duplication causes the creation of another low-res thumbnail file, plus a "modelresource" file.
The thumbnail is a JPEG version of the photo, scaled down to 1024px on the long edge. Though that's quite a bit more than what you really need for an actual "thumbnail," it's probably considerably smaller than your original photo, even if that was also a JPEG. (Even at 512 ppi, that's enough for a 2 inch "thumbnail.")
The "modelresource" file appears to be a "baked" full-res JPEG version of the original plus all of the modifications you've made to it. If the original was also a JPEG, this baked version may be either larger or smaller, so in that sense duplicating the original could be "expensive." But, if you are importing raw files, PNGs, TIFFs, etc, this file is almost certainly going to be smaller than your original file, and is thus a "cheap" copy.
It is possible that these "modelresource" files "age out" when not recently used, since it would be possible to re-generate them if Photos remembers the list of changes you've made to the original. If Photos does that, then these baked copies behaves similarly to Lightroom's "catalog previews" database.
Bottom line, making duplicates of your master photos will cause the library to grow, but not as fast as if you import multiple on-disk copies of the same photo.
Originally by user4141. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user4141
11y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes. In Apple Photos you can duplicate a photo and use the duplicate as another editable version.
Ways to do it:
- Image menu → Duplicate 1 Photo
- Press Command-D
- Right-click / Control-click → Duplicate 1 Photo
Based on the community answers, this does not create a second original file on disk in the way a true file copy would. If you use Show Referenced File in Finder, both the original and the duplicate point back to the same source file, so it behaves much like a Lightroom virtual copy.
The exact Finder behavior may depend on whether you import photos as referenced files or copy them into the Photos library, but the practical result is the same: you can keep multiple edited versions without manually making separate original files yourself.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI11y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Do Lightroom virtual copies get saved in XMP sidecar files?
Can Lightroom automatically create virtual copies when adding photos to a collection?
How can I quickly find and remove duplicate virtual copies in Lightroom stacks?
How can I keep only the final virtual copy in Lightroom?
How can I manage multiple Lightroom crops for different aspect ratios more efficiently?