Can a Sigma 50mm f/1.4 work for macro with Kenko extension tubes?

Asked 11/13/2019

4 views

2 answers

0

I want to try macro photography without buying a dedicated macro lens yet. If I use Kenko extension tubes with electrical contacts on a Sigma 50mm f/1.4, can I get good results? Are there any limitations or practical tips I should know before buying a used set?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

6y ago

2 Answers

1

Extension tubes, so long as they make electrical connection, affect nothing except the amount of light that actually reaches the camera sensor. They have no influence on anything other than the focussing distance.

Because of that, yes, 68 mm of extension tube will get you very very close indeed on a 50mm lens, in fact I've found 50mm to be about the break-point on 68mm tubes.
You may find you have to remove the 12mm, as at 68mm, the far-point for focussing might actually be inside the lens, or so close you keep banging into things.

The fact that it claims to be able to carry the AF information you will quickly discover is more a theory than a fact. It will try to AF, but will almost never work. You are far better off going full manual for macro work. You will also need a lot of light.

If you are outdoors, then you might have to rely on a ring-flash & a bit of guesswork for focus. Indoors I use constant video lighting so I can see my focus easily through the viewfinder.
60-odd mm on a 50mm lens & your DoF is going to be measured in millimetres or less, even stopped down to f/5.6 or f/8, where most of this type of lens is at its sharpest, so you will need a tripod & either a macro rail or use manual focus pull to generate focus stacks.
If you are outdoors or trying to capture something moving, you might need to sacrifice some of the extension so you can get a deeper DoF & shoot from further away to get your subject in frame.

I normally focus stack to get sharp right the way through but this one I did in a single shot to capture just one element in focus, so you can see how shallow each slice of a focus stack would be. This was done on a Nikon 50mm 1.4 at f/4 & either 56 or 68mm extension [I didn't document it at the time]
I actually did this hand-held & just took a couple of dozen shots once I'd got my lighting right, until I got one with the 'happy accident' focussing I liked the most

enter image description here

Incidentally, my extension tubes are just 'mickey mouse' cheap tubes from eBay. I think I paid maybe $£€ 25 for them. They have metal mounts, but are plastic otherwise - but they don't wobble, don't let in light & carry the electrical data, so my AF works [in theory] but more importantly my aperture & exposure meters work correctly. As all you are really buying is an air gap not a lens of any sort, I didn't see the need to buy anything more expensive.

Originally by user57929. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user57929

6y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Yes. Extension tubes can let a 50mm lens focus much closer, so they’re a reasonable low-cost way to try macro before buying a dedicated macro lens. Tubes don’t change optical quality themselves; they mainly reduce the lens’s focusing distance and also reduce the amount of light reaching the sensor.

With a 50mm lens, a large amount of extension can get you very close, but it also makes the working distance extremely short. With a full set, the far focus point may become so close that it’s awkward to use.

A few practical limits:

  • Autofocus usually becomes unreliable for macro with tubes, even if the contacts pass AF signals.
  • Manual focus is generally the better approach.
  • You’ll need plenty of light because extension reduces effective light.

So yes, you can get satisfying results, especially for experimenting and learning. Just expect close working distances, weak AF performance, and a stronger need for careful manual focusing and lighting.

UniqueBot

AI

6y ago

Your Answer