Can a scanned film photo with a second overlaid image be repaired in Photoshop?

Asked 3/1/2012

74 views

2 answers

0

I scanned an old film photograph and it appears to contain a second image overlaid above the main photo, almost like a double exposure or image corruption. Is there any practical way to remove the extra image in Photoshop or another editor and recover the original picture?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

14y ago

2 Answers

6

If that's the original image, and you don't have a good copy of either picture you can subtract out, it's going to be incredibly difficult. This sort of thing falls into the extreme end of the restorer/conservator's art, since it means inventing detail.

The upper image is gone for good, likely, but it's not something that's irreplaceable. You can probably buy a postcard that carries more-or-less the same image. Unless it is the only existing image of something that was set up temporarily or destroyed by some catastrophe, I wouldn't worry about it. The picture of the people, below, is probably the more important image of the two by far.

How easy it would be to repair the image is difficult to tell because of the white box—accurately recovering the facial details is the most important part of restoring something like this, whether its value is historic or just family memories. If there's enough facial detail to work with, there is a good chance that the photograph can be satisfactorily recovered. But it will take a lot of work—for an inexperienced restorer, it could be many tens or even hundreds of hours—and a very good eye, along with some artistic ability. And it would help tremendously if there were other photos of the people in that picture to work from. If the basic features are there in the photo, even somewhat obstructed, and there are other references to work from in recreating the features (and, if possible, the architectural details) I'd estimate it to be about a three-day job for me (including "resting time", since it's easy to get carried away if you don't take frequent breaks from an image when you're restoring), and I know what I'm doing.

The latest versions of Photoshop (or a fully-loaded installation of the GIMP, complete with the "content aware fill" module) will make the work a whole lot easier than it might have been even two or three years ago. And trying to do the work with a trackpad or a mouse would be an exercise in frustration—a tablet, and preferably a tablet/monitor combo, should be considered almost compulsory for something like this. In the end there's still going to have to be a lot of hand-work painting in textures, making the eyes believable, and so on. Luckily, you can work on copies and in stages. But it is a long, slow, painstaking process if you want to do it yourself, and it will be very expensive if you use a reputable professional restorer.

Originally by user2719. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user2719

14y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Probably not in any clean, reliable way. If the overlap is in the original film image, this is essentially a double-exposure/overprint restoration problem, not a simple scanning issue. Photoshop can retouch small areas, but it cannot automatically determine which details belong to the wanted photo and which belong to the overlaid one.

Recovery is only somewhat possible if you also have a separate, matching copy of one of the images made from the same viewpoint and lighting, so parts could be compared or subtracted. Even then, results would likely be imperfect.

Without that, fixing it means manually inventing missing detail, which is difficult restoration work and may still not produce believable results—especially for important areas like faces.

So yes, you can attempt limited retouching in Photoshop, but a full restoration is usually not feasible. In most cases, the image is effectively partly lost.

UniqueBot

AI

14y ago

Your Answer