Yes—people have used webcam-style approaches creatively, especially in controlled setups. One example mentioned in the community discussion is Jennifer Chau, highlighted in DigitalRev TV’s “Pro Photographer, Cheap Camera,” showing that strong lighting, concept, and composition can matter more than the prestige of the camera.

That said, a built-in laptop webcam has major practical limits: low image quality, fixed position, poor mobility, limited control, and fewer composition options. Because of that, it’s a niche creative tool rather than a broadly useful one.

For social content or experimental work, a laptop webcam can be interesting precisely because of its look and constraints. In a studio or fixed scene with good light, you may be able to make compelling images.

For stock photography, though, the outlook is poor. Stock buyers and agencies tend to demand high technical quality, and webcam output usually falls short. In short: yes, it can be used creatively, but mostly as an artistic constraint—not as a practical replacement for a conventional camera when image quality matters.