Can a 3–4 stop ND filter let me use a wider aperture and autofocus in bright sun?
Asked 5/16/2018
3 views
2 answers
0
I was shooting outdoors on a bright sunny day with a Canon EOS 6D and Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art, trying to keep shutter speeds around 1/30 to 1/60 sec. At ISO 100, even with a polarizing filter, I had to stop down to about f/13–f/16, which made the background more distracting than I wanted.
If I add a 3–4 stop ND filter, could I open up to roughly f/4–f/5.6 while still using the optical viewfinder and autofocus? I already have a 10-stop ND, but that is too dark to work with easily. I may also need to stack it with the polarizer. Will a moderate ND filter still allow normal viewing and focusing, and is this the right way to get a less visible background at those shutter speeds?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
8y ago
2 Answers
3
Since you were shooting at f/16 and around 1/30 or 1/60 s. (ISO 100) the scene that day was around 13 EV (see an Exposition Value table here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exposure_value#EV_as_an_indicator_of_camera_settings).
Using an ND4 filter would take you to a ~9 EV situation, so in terms of autofocus you would not have any problems, since EOS 6D is capable of focusing even at -3EV situations (as Canon states in their webpage) as long as you use the central AF, which is the most precise.
ND filters would enable you to stop down [edit:] widen the aperture, so you can get a more blurred background. However, this blur is what we know as bokeh and it is different from the motion blur you mention at the beginning of your question.
Obviously, a wider aperture will make the background look more blurred but if you are looking for that motion blur you mention, you should practice a technique called 'panning'. And when 'panning', the piece of equipment that will help you the most is probably a lens with image stabilization (Sigma's HSM, Tamron's VC, Canon's IS...), though it is not indispensable at all.
'Panning' (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panning_(camera)) is a difficult to master, but very funny technique consisting of shooting with slow speeds (1/10, 1/15, 1/30, 1/50 s., for example) and following a fast-moving subject as you expose the photo, so it will look sharp (or sharp enough at least) while the rest of the scene is motion-blurred in the direction of the movement. You will need SERVO autofocus, slow shutter speeds (go for S or M modes) and a nice, stable position while shooting.
Originally by user75403. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user75403
8y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes. A 3–4 stop ND filter should let you use a wider aperture in bright sun while keeping your shutter speed around 1/30–1/60 sec, and it should still be usable through the viewfinder with autofocus.
An ND filter reduces light reaching the camera, so you can open the aperture from roughly f/16 toward about f/5.6 or f/4 at the same shutter speed and ISO. That will reduce depth of field and make the background less noticeable.
A moderate ND usually does not prevent autofocus on a DSLR like the 6D. Focusing is done with the lens at its maximum aperture, and 3–4 stops of light loss is still well within what cameras can usually handle in daylight. A 10-stop ND is much more difficult, which is why it often requires focusing before mounting.
Also note: opening the aperture gives shallower depth of field (background blur/bokeh), which is different from motion blur caused by a slow shutter speed.
Your polarizer already cuts some light too, so stacking may work, though extra filters can increase the chance of unwanted reflections or vignetting.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI8y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Should I buy a 9-stop or 10-stop ND filter for long-exposure water shots?
Can a circular polarizer replace an ND filter for propeller blur at an airshow?
Why does my variable ND2–400 filter have more markings than the listed stop values?
What ND filter strength do I need to shoot at f/1.4 in daylight with flash at 1/200s?
Do very fast shutter speeds reduce image quality in bright daylight?