Best lens setup for travel on a Canon 7D: one all-in-one zoom or multiple lenses?
Asked 6/15/2011
3 views
2 answers
0
I travel with a Canon 7D and currently bring a Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 and a Canon 70-300mm f/4-5.6. That covers most situations, but I end up changing lenses often. The 70-300 gives me better image quality overall, while the 17-70 is useful for wider scenes.
I'm trying to balance image quality, low weight, flexibility, and fewer lens changes while traveling. Would it make more sense to add another lens for portraits or close-ups, use close-up attachments to save space, or replace my current setup with a single travel zoom such as a 24-105mm or similar? What would you choose if the goal is to travel relatively light but still stay versatile?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
15y ago
2 Answers
7
If your price isn't as unlimited as the Canon EF 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6 L IS USM lens that jrista pointed out, you might want to look at the Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Lens. It only weighs one third of the weight of the giant beast, and still gives a huge range. This lens is designed for the APS-C sensor that your 7D has. Just yesterday Canon Europe actually announced a 2nd version of this lens, so if you are thinking about buying one you might want to hold out for that version.
The right answer is going to depend heavily on how you like to travel. If you are traveling out of your car and don't mind the weight, then extra lenses for different purposes would be the way to go. If you want a light kit that does it all with a single lens, keeps you mobile and ready for the action, an all in one solution like one of the lenses above might be the best.
You said you want to travel relatively lightly, so I would consider something like the 18-200mm lens, with maybe a single prime lens either in the 35,50,85, or 135mm range. This will give you a light, small, fast(large aperture)lens to blur the background and shoot in low light situations that the 18-200mm lens will not perform as well.
Best case scenario in my opinion while considering price/performance/weight/and quality:
or
I asked a similar question here a few weeks ago, limiting the question to 1-3 lenses, while giving quality the highest value of importance. Price was not a factor in my question at all. You can see that question and its answers here.
Originally by user4892. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user4892
15y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
There isn’t one perfect solution—your best choice depends on whether your priority is less lens swapping or lower weight.
If minimizing lens changes matters most, a superzoom is the simplest answer. For a 7D, options mentioned were the Canon EF-S 18-200mm and the Canon 28-300mm L. The trade-off is typical: more convenience, but usually more compromise in size, speed, and/or image quality than a smaller specialized kit. The 28-300mm especially is a one-lens solution, but it’s large and heavy, so it may not really help you “travel light.”
If traveling lighter matters most, your current two-lens setup may already be the more balanced approach. Two lenses often give better quality and flexibility than one huge do-everything zoom, even if they require swaps.
So think of these as separate goals:
- Fewer lens changes: choose an all-in-one zoom.
- Better balance of weight and image quality: keep a compact multi-lens kit.
For APS-C travel, a lens starting around 18mm is generally more useful than one starting at 24mm or 28mm for wide scenes.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI15y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Is there a 24-70mm f/2.8 lens for Canon that does not extend when zooming?
Canon EF-S 15-85mm plus 50mm f/1.8 vs EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 for a 550D
How do the Canon 55-250mm, 75-300mm, and 70-300mm differ, and which makes sense after the 18-55 kit lens?
Best walkaround zoom for a Canon 7D: EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS or EF 24-70mm f/2.8L?
Best sharp wide-angle lens for travel portraits on a Canon 7D?